Dickerson v. Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC

Filing 19

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties 10/14/2015. Mediation deadline 1/7/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 4/22/2016. Expert disclosures due 4/29/2016. Expert rebuttal due 5/13/2016. Expert discovery due 5/27/2016. Dispositive motions due 6/ 10/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 4/23/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/2/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 9/26/2016 - 10/6/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 7, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TYRONE DICKERSON, Case No. 15-cv-02979-JST Plaintiff, 9 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 10 11 GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC, United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 14 15 The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10: 16 Event Deadline 17 Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings October 14, 2015 Mediation deadline January 7, 2016 20 Fact discovery cut-off April 22, 2016 21 Expert disclosures April 29, 2016 22 Expert rebuttal May 13, 2016 Expert discovery cut-off May 27, 2016 Deadline to file dispositive motions June 10, 2016 Pretrial conference statement due August 23, 2016 Pretrial conference September 2, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 18 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 Event 1 2 Deadline Trial September 26, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Estimate of trial length (in days) 8 days 3 4 5 6 7 Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders. The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 8 counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 9 manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 10 calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 12 disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party- 13 controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 14 a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 15 to grant a continuance. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 7, 2015 18 19 20 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?