Dickerson v. Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC
Filing
19
SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties 10/14/2015. Mediation deadline 1/7/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 4/22/2016. Expert disclosures due 4/29/2016. Expert rebuttal due 5/13/2016. Expert discovery due 5/27/2016. Dispositive motions due 6/ 10/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 4/23/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/2/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 9/26/2016 - 10/6/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 7, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
TYRONE DICKERSON,
Case No. 15-cv-02979-JST
Plaintiff,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
11
GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
13
14
15
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
16
Event
Deadline
17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings
October 14, 2015
Mediation deadline
January 7, 2016
20
Fact discovery cut-off
April 22, 2016
21
Expert disclosures
April 29, 2016
22
Expert rebuttal
May 13, 2016
Expert discovery cut-off
May 27, 2016
Deadline to file dispositive motions
June 10, 2016
Pretrial conference statement due
August 23, 2016
Pretrial conference
September 2, 2016
at 2:00 p.m.
18
19
23
24
25
26
27
28
Event
1
2
Deadline
Trial
September 26, 2016
at 8:30 a.m.
Estimate of trial length (in days)
8 days
3
4
5
6
7
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
8
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
9
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
10
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
12
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-
13
controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
14
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
15
to grant a continuance.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 7, 2015
18
19
20
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?