Sims v. Hedrick et al
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING 65 Stipulation to Dismiss. Case closed. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/28/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
I
2
James Sims
H-90920
California State Prison - Sacramento
P.O. Box 290066
Represa, CA 95671-0066
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
JAY M. GOLDMAN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
3
4
5
.6
7
BRYANKAO
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 240242
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 941 02-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-5564
Fax: (415) 703-5843
E-mail: Bryan.Kao@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
J. Collier
Plaintiff in ProSe
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
C 15-cv-03003-LB
JAMES MARION SIMS,
14
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(ii))
15
v.
16
17
B. HEDRICK, et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Plaintiff James Sims and Defendant J. Collier have resolved this case in its entirety. In
21
accordance with their settlement agreement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii),
22
the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice. The filing of this stipulation
23
automatically terminates this action.
24
II I
25
Ill
26
Ill
27
28
I
Stip. & [Proposed] Order Voluntary Dismissal (C 15-cv-03003-LB)
1
Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees in connection with this action.
2
It is so stipulated.
3
~~~
JeS Sims
Dated: July 28, 2017
4
,M
S'r._:_
aintif.f in Pro Se
5
6
7
8
Dated: July 28, 2017
~~---
9
Deputy Attorney General
California Attorney General's Office
10
Attorneys for Defendant
J. Collier
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
Dated:
16
--,1~--)_;;t.,_8,},__1_,_7__
I
I
The Honorable Laurel Beeler
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
SF20 16400528
21007968.doc
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. & [Proposed] Order Voluntary Dismissal (C 15-cv-03003-LB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?