Nokchan v. Lyft, Inc.

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING re #7 Stipulation to Extend Defendant Lyft's Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Lyft, Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/23/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MAYER BROWN LLP
JOHN ZAIMES (SBN 91933)
[e-mail]
RUTH ZADIKANY (SBN 260288)
[e-mail]
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1503
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
LYFT, INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

MICHAEL NOKCHAN, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO THE COMPLAINT

13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16

vs.
LYFT, INC., a Delaware corporation; and
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

17

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS

Hon. Joseph C. Spero
Complaint filed: June 29, 2015

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

716937663.1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Michael Nokchan (“Nokchan”) and

2

Defendant Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate

3

and agree as follows:

4
5

WHEREAS, Nokchan filed his putative class action Complaint in this Court on or about
June 29, 2015;

6

WHEREAS, Nokchan served the Complaint on Lyft on July 6, 2015;

7

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), Lyft currently has through

8

and including July 27, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Nokchan’s Complaint;

9

WHEREAS, Lyft has requested, and Nokchan has consented, to extend the time in which

10

Lyft can answer or otherwise respond to Nokchan’s Complaint by an additional 30 days, through

11

and including August 26, 2015;

12
13

WHEREAS, an additional 30 days for Lyft to answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint will not alter the date for any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

14

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties,

15

through their respective counsel of record, that Lyft shall answer or otherwise respond to

16

Nokchan’s Complaint by August 26, 2015.

17

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, I, John P. Zaimes, attest that I obtained concurrence in

18

the filing of this document from the signatories.

19

Dated: July 22, 2015

20

SETAREH LAW GROUP
SHAUN SETAREH
TUVIA KOROBKIN

21
22
23
24
25

By: s/ Shaun Setareh
Shaun Setareh
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL NOKCHAN, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated

26
27
28
-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS

1

Dated: July 22, 2015

MAYER BROWN LLP
JOHN P. ZAIMES
RUTH ZADIKANY

2
3
4

By: s/ John P. Zaimes
John P. Zaimes

5

Attorneys for Defendant
LYFT, INC.

6
7

14
15

R NIA

A

H

ER

o
C. Sper

FO

RT

13

seph
Judge Jo

NO

12

D
RDERE

OO
IT IS S

LI

11

UNIT
ED

10

Dated: 7/23/15

RT
U
O

9

S

8

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS