Nokchan v. Lyft, Inc.
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING re #7 Stipulation to Extend Defendant Lyft's Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Lyft, Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/23/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MAYER BROWN LLP
JOHN ZAIMES (SBN 91933)
jzaimes@mayerbrown.com
RUTH ZADIKANY (SBN 260288)
rzadikany@mayerbrown.com
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1503
Telephone: (213) 229-9500
Facsimile: (213) 625-0248
Attorneys for Defendant
LYFT, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
MICHAEL NOKCHAN, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO THE COMPLAINT
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
vs.
LYFT, INC., a Delaware corporation; and
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
Case No. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS
Hon. Joseph C. Spero
Complaint filed: June 29, 2015
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
716937663.1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Michael Nokchan (“Nokchan”) and
2
Defendant Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate
3
and agree as follows:
4
5
WHEREAS, Nokchan filed his putative class action Complaint in this Court on or about
June 29, 2015;
6
WHEREAS, Nokchan served the Complaint on Lyft on July 6, 2015;
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), Lyft currently has through
8
and including July 27, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Nokchan’s Complaint;
9
WHEREAS, Lyft has requested, and Nokchan has consented, to extend the time in which
10
Lyft can answer or otherwise respond to Nokchan’s Complaint by an additional 30 days, through
11
and including August 26, 2015;
12
13
WHEREAS, an additional 30 days for Lyft to answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint will not alter the date for any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;
14
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties,
15
through their respective counsel of record, that Lyft shall answer or otherwise respond to
16
Nokchan’s Complaint by August 26, 2015.
17
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, I, John P. Zaimes, attest that I obtained concurrence in
18
the filing of this document from the signatories.
19
Dated: July 22, 2015
20
SETAREH LAW GROUP
SHAUN SETAREH
TUVIA KOROBKIN
21
22
23
24
25
By: s/ Shaun Setareh
Shaun Setareh
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL NOKCHAN, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS
1
Dated: July 22, 2015
MAYER BROWN LLP
JOHN P. ZAIMES
RUTH ZADIKANY
2
3
4
By: s/ John P. Zaimes
John P. Zaimes
5
Attorneys for Defendant
LYFT, INC.
6
7
14
15
R NIA
A
H
ER
o
C. Sper
FO
RT
13
seph
Judge Jo
NO
12
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
11
UNIT
ED
10
Dated: 7/23/15
RT
U
O
9
S
8
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND LYFT, INC.’S TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03008-JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?