Nokchan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/14/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289
rfliegel@littler.com
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998
aspurchise@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendants
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MICHAEL NOKCHAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
SECOND STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADING
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their undersigned counsel,
hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC may have until
August 21, 2015 to file their answer, motion or other response to the Complaint of Plaintiff Michael
Nokchan in the captioned matter.
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 29, 2015. On July 24th, the parties stipulated
for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint until August 13, 2015. The parties are now
stipulating to an additional brief extension of time so that they may continue their efforts to meet and
confer in good faith regarding the most efficient way to proceed in light of this Court’s previous
rulings in the related cases of Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 14-cv05241 and Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 14-cv-5200. No objections,
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
1.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
1
arguments, or defenses are waived by either party by virtue of this stipulation. This stipulation will
2
not require the alteration of any deadline already set by Court Order. Indeed, the Court’s August 3,
3
2015 Order (ECF No. 19) set the initial case management conference for this matter for November
4
12, 2015.
5
6
7
8
In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Plaintiff’s counsel, Shaun Setarah, has
concurred in this filing and use of his electronic signature below.
Dated: August 13, 2015
9
/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
ROD M. FLIEGEL
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND
RASIER, LLC
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Shaun Setareh________________________
SHAUN SETAREH, ESQUIRE
TUVIA KOROBKIN, ESQUIRE
SETAREH LAW GROUP
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
shaun@setarehlaw.com
tuvia@setarehlaw.com
15
16
25
ER
R NIA
FO
dwa
Judge E
H
24
RT
23
hen
rd M. C
NO
22
LI
21
IT IS SO
________________________
Edward M. Chen
DERED
SO OR
U. S. DistrictIT IS
Judge
A
20
RT
U
O
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ORDERED:
S
18
UNIT
ED
17
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
2.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I, Rod M. Fliegel, hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of the
3
foregoing Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to be filed with the Court
4
and served upon the following:
Via CM/ECF:
5
Shaun Setareh, Esquire
6
Tuvia Korobkin, Esquire
7
Setareh Law Group
8
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
9
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
shaun@setarehlaw.com
10
tuvia@setarehlaw.com
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
Rod M. Fliegel
14
15
Dated: August 13, 2015
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
3.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?