Nokchan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 1 Complaint (Extension of time to Respond on behalf of Plaintiff, Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Hirease LLC) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/21/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289 rfliegel@littler.com ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998 aspurchise@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, California 94108.2693 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MICHAEL NOKCHAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al., Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, 19 hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), Rasier, LLC 20 (“Rasier”), and Hirease LLC (“Hirease”) (collectively “Defendants”) may have until fourteen (14) 21 days after the Court’s ruling on the motion to consolidate in Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et 22 al., Civil Action No. 14-cv-05241 (ECF No. 84) or the filing of a Consolidated Complaint that 23 includes the captioned matter, whichever is later, to file their answer, motion or other response to 24 the Complaint of Plaintiff Michael Nokchan in the captioned matter. 25 Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 29, 2015. On July 24th, Plaintiff and 26 Defendants Uber and Rasier stipulated for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint until 27 August 13, 2015. Defendants Uber and Rasier received an additional extension of time to respond 28 until August 21, 2015 to meet and confer in good faith regarding the most efficient way to proceed LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 1. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC 1 in light of this Court’s previous rulings in the related cases of Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et 2 al., Civil Action No. 14-cv-05241 and Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 3 14-cv-5200. Subsequent to that stipulation, Ronald Gillette filed a motion to consolidate the 4 Gillette, Mohamed, and Nokchan litigation. As a result of that motion and the parties’ meet and 5 confer efforts, they now agree the most efficient course is to await the final outcome of the motion to 6 consolidate before Defendants are required to respond to the Complaint in this matter and Plaintiff 7 Nokchan is required to take further action. Furthermore, Hirease’s original responsive pleading 8 deadline is August 31, 2015, and has obtained no previous extensions of time to respond. No 9 objections, arguments, or defenses are waived by any party by virtue of this stipulation. This 10 stipulation will not require the alteration of any deadline already set by Court Order. Indeed, the 11 Court’s August 3, 2015 Order (ECF No. 19) set the initial case management conference for this 12 matter for November 12, 2015. 13 In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Plaintiff’s counsel, Shaun Setareh, and 14 Hirease’s counsel, Timothy Hix, has concurred in this filing and use of their electronic signatures 15 below. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 2. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC 1 Dated: August 21, 2015 2 /s/ Rod M. Fliegel ROD M. FLIEGEL LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND RASIER, LLC 3 4 5 6 /s/ Shaun Setareh________________________ SHAUN SETAREH, ESQUIRE TUVIA KOROBKIN, ESQUIRE SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 shaun@setarehlaw.com tuvia@setarehlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL NOKCHAN 7 8 9 10 11 12 /s/ Timothy L. Hix_______________________ Timothy L. Hix, Esquire SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 333 S. Hope Street, Suite 3900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406 thix@seyfarth.com Attorneys for Defendant HIREASE LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 UNIT ED S 22 23 ERED O ORD IT IS S _____________________________________ HONORABLE EDWARD en CHEN M. . Ch ward M d Judge E 24 H ER LI RT 26 FO NO 25 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 R NIA Dated: 8/21/15 RT U O 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 3. A 19 N F D IS T IC T O R C Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Rod M. Fliegel, hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of the 4 foregoing Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to be filed with the Court 5 and served upon the following: Via CM/ECF: 6 Shaun Setareh, Esquire 7 Tuvia Korobkin, Esquire 8 Setareh Law Group 9 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907 10 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 11 shaun@setarehlaw.com 12 tuvia@setarehlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 14 /s/ Rod M. Fliegel Rod M. Fliegel 15 16 Dated: August 21, 2015 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 4. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?