Nokchan v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 1 Complaint (Extension of time to Respond on behalf of Plaintiff, Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Hirease LLC) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/21/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289
rfliegel@littler.com
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998
aspurchise@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendants
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MICHAEL NOKCHAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their undersigned counsel,
19
hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), Rasier, LLC
20
(“Rasier”), and Hirease LLC (“Hirease”) (collectively “Defendants”) may have until fourteen (14)
21
days after the Court’s ruling on the motion to consolidate in Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et
22
al., Civil Action No. 14-cv-05241 (ECF No. 84) or the filing of a Consolidated Complaint that
23
includes the captioned matter, whichever is later, to file their answer, motion or other response to
24
the Complaint of Plaintiff Michael Nokchan in the captioned matter.
25
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 29, 2015. On July 24th, Plaintiff and
26
Defendants Uber and Rasier stipulated for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint until
27
August 13, 2015. Defendants Uber and Rasier received an additional extension of time to respond
28
until August 21, 2015 to meet and confer in good faith regarding the most efficient way to proceed
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
1.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
1
in light of this Court’s previous rulings in the related cases of Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et
2
al., Civil Action No. 14-cv-05241 and Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., Civil Action No.
3
14-cv-5200. Subsequent to that stipulation, Ronald Gillette filed a motion to consolidate the
4
Gillette, Mohamed, and Nokchan litigation. As a result of that motion and the parties’ meet and
5
confer efforts, they now agree the most efficient course is to await the final outcome of the motion to
6
consolidate before Defendants are required to respond to the Complaint in this matter and Plaintiff
7
Nokchan is required to take further action. Furthermore, Hirease’s original responsive pleading
8
deadline is August 31, 2015, and has obtained no previous extensions of time to respond. No
9
objections, arguments, or defenses are waived by any party by virtue of this stipulation. This
10
stipulation will not require the alteration of any deadline already set by Court Order. Indeed, the
11
Court’s August 3, 2015 Order (ECF No. 19) set the initial case management conference for this
12
matter for November 12, 2015.
13
In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Plaintiff’s counsel, Shaun Setareh, and
14
Hirease’s counsel, Timothy Hix, has concurred in this filing and use of their electronic signatures
15
below.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
2.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
1
Dated: August 21, 2015
2
/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
ROD M. FLIEGEL
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND
RASIER, LLC
3
4
5
6
/s/ Shaun Setareh________________________
SHAUN SETAREH, ESQUIRE
TUVIA KOROBKIN, ESQUIRE
SETAREH LAW GROUP
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
shaun@setarehlaw.com
tuvia@setarehlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL NOKCHAN
7
8
9
10
11
12
/s/ Timothy L. Hix_______________________
Timothy L. Hix, Esquire
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
333 S. Hope Street, Suite 3900
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
thix@seyfarth.com
Attorneys for Defendant
HIREASE LLC
13
14
15
16
17
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
20
UNIT
ED
S
22
23
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
_____________________________________
HONORABLE EDWARD en CHEN
M.
. Ch
ward M
d
Judge E
24
H
ER
LI
RT
26
FO
NO
25
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
R NIA
Dated: 8/21/15
RT
U
O
21
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
3.
A
19
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
1
2
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Rod M. Fliegel, hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of the
4
foregoing Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to be filed with the Court
5
and served upon the following:
Via CM/ECF:
6
Shaun Setareh, Esquire
7
Tuvia Korobkin, Esquire
8
Setareh Law Group
9
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
10
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
11
shaun@setarehlaw.com
12
tuvia@setarehlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13
14
/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
Rod M. Fliegel
15
16
Dated: August 21, 2015
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
4.
Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?