Williams v. People of the State of California et al

Filing 38

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. The "Objection" is denied, as plaintiff fails to identify any cognizable basis for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 7, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
CHARLES LEE WILLIAMS,

No. C-15-3013 MMC

13
Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION

14
v.
15
ROY SCHEINGART, et al.,
16

Defendants.

17

/

18
19

On November 20, 2015, the Court issued an order dismissing the above-titled

20

action. Thereafter, on November 30, 2015, the Clerk of Court entered judgment thereon.

21

The Court is in receipt of plaintiff’s “Objection Made In-Chambers and Demand for

22

In-Camera Conference,” filed December 2, 2015, which the Court construes as a motion for

23

reconsideration. So construed, the “Objection” is denied, as plaintiff fails to identify any

24

cognizable basis for reconsideration.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 7, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge