Esquivel v. Sprint/United Management Company et al
Filing
42
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 1/31/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, et al.,
12
No. 3:15-cv-01300 LB
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
Cross-Complainants,
13
v.
14
MOSES ESQUIVEL,
15
16
17
18
Cross-Defendant.
________________________________/
At the parties’ request (see ECF No. 38 at 14), the court continues the dates in this case by
approximately one month as set forth in this table.
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Filing Date/Disclosure
Deadline/Hearing Date
Updated Joint Case-Management Conference Statement
3/17/2016
Further Case Management Conference
20
Case Event
3/24/2016 at 11:00 a.m.
ADR completion date
3/17/2016
Non-expert discovery completion date
4/29/2016
Expert disclosures required by Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure
6/2/2016
Rebuttal expert disclosures
7/1/2016
Expert discovery completion date
7/22/2016
Last hearing date for dispositive motions and/or further case
management conference
6/16/2016 at 9:30 a.m.
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
No. 3:15-cv-03022 LB
1
Meet and confer re pretrial filings
7/25/2016
2
Pretrial filings due
8/11/2016
3
Oppositions, Objections, Exhibits, and Depo Designations due
8/18/2016
4
Final Pretrial Conference
9/1/2016 at 1:30 p.m.
5
Trial
9/12/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Length of Bench Trial
2 days
6
7
The procedures in the court’s earlier pretrial order at ECF No. 31 remain in effect.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
January 31, 2016
__________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
No. 3:15-cv-03022 LB
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?