Esquivel v. Sprint/United Management Company et al

Filing 42

REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 1/31/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 8 SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, et al., 12 No. 3:15-cv-01300 LB REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER Cross-Complainants, 13 v. 14 MOSES ESQUIVEL, 15 16 17 18 Cross-Defendant. ________________________________/ At the parties’ request (see ECF No. 38 at 14), the court continues the dates in this case by approximately one month as set forth in this table. 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Filing Date/Disclosure Deadline/Hearing Date Updated Joint Case-Management Conference Statement 3/17/2016 Further Case Management Conference 20 Case Event 3/24/2016 at 11:00 a.m. ADR completion date 3/17/2016 Non-expert discovery completion date 4/29/2016 Expert disclosures required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6/2/2016 Rebuttal expert disclosures 7/1/2016 Expert discovery completion date 7/22/2016 Last hearing date for dispositive motions and/or further case management conference 6/16/2016 at 9:30 a.m. REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER No. 3:15-cv-03022 LB 1 Meet and confer re pretrial filings 7/25/2016 2 Pretrial filings due 8/11/2016 3 Oppositions, Objections, Exhibits, and Depo Designations due 8/18/2016 4 Final Pretrial Conference 9/1/2016 at 1:30 p.m. 5 Trial 9/12/2016 at 8:30 a.m. Length of Bench Trial 2 days 6 7 The procedures in the court’s earlier pretrial order at ECF No. 31 remain in effect. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: January 31, 2016 __________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER No. 3:15-cv-03022 LB 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?