Green et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER 16 to Stay Proceedings Pending MDL Consideration. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/18/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 William A. Kershaw (State Bar No. 057486) Stuart C. Talley (State Bar No. 180374) KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, California 95864 Telephone: (916) 448-9800 Facsimile: (916) 669-4499 Email: wkershaw@kcrlegal.com Email: stalley@kcrlegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03130-RS MARGARET GREEN and NATHANIEL GREEN, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of B.G., a Minor, 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING MDL CONSIDERATION Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 17 18 Hon. Richard Seeborg Courtroom 3 – 17th Floor GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 Good cause appearing, the parties’ joint stipulation to stay proceedings in the abovecaptioned action is GRANTED as follows: 1. This action is STAYED pending the transfer decision of the Judicial Panel on 25 Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”) in In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability 26 Litigation (MDL No. 2657); 27 28 2. All deadlines, with the exception of Defendant’s obligation to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint are VACATED until further order of the Court; and -1ORDER TO STAY PENDING MDL CONSIDERATION CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03130 RS 1 2 3 3. The parties shall notify the Court of the MDL Panel’s decision within ten days of the decision. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: __________________. 8/18/15 ___________________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER TO STAY PENDING MDL CONSIDERATION CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03130 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?