Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice

Filing 31

REQUEST for Clarification; Joint Response due by 5/11/2016. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/3/2016. (mejlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, 5 6 7 8 Case No. 15-cv-03186-MEJ REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 23 v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. 9 10 In reviewing the parties’ Summary Judgment Motions and supporting materials, the Court United States District Court Northern District of California 11 has discovered an inconsistency with respect to the numbering of a certain withheld document and 12 seeks clarification from the parties as to whether this is a mere typographical error or an issue that 13 requires further briefing. Specifically, while Plaintiff, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (“EFF”), 14 appears to be challenging the Government’s decision to withhold Document 27, the Government’s 15 supporting materials all refer to Document 28. See Pl.’s Mot. for Summ. J. at 7, Dkt. No. 23 16 (listing Document 27 in chart summarizing documents withheld under Exemption 5); Pl.’s 17 Opp’n/Reply at 4-5, Dkt. No. 30 (referring to document number 27); Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. at 18 11, Dkt. No. 19 (referring to Document 28); Myrick Decl. ¶¶ 36, 42, Dkt. No. 21 (also referring to 19 Document 28); Def.’s Opp’n/Reply at 6, Dkt. No. 25 (referring to Document 28). The 20 Government withheld both documents according to the Vaughn Index. Exs. to Myrick Decl., 21 Exhibit O (Vaughn Index) at 83-91, Dkt. No. 22. 22 The Court thus ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and submit a joint statement by 23 May 11, 2016 as to whether Document 27 or Document 28 is at issue. If this discrepancy is more 24 than a typographical error, the parties should also address whether they require further briefing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2016 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?