181 Sales, Inc. v. Karcher North America, Inc.

Filing 30

SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 11/3/2015. Expert disclosures due 3/11/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 3/25/2016. Expert rebuttal disclosures due 4/1/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 4/25/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 4/29/2016. Pr etrial conference statement due 7/12/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/22/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Bench Trial set for 8/15/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

181 SALES, INC.,

Case No. 15-cv-03191-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

KARCHER NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

November 3, 2015

Expert disclosures

March 11, 2016

20

Fact discovery cut-off

March 25, 2016

21

Expert rebuttal disclosures

April 1, 2016

22

Expert discovery cut-off

April 25, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions

April 29, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due

July 12, 2016

Pretrial conference

July 22, 2016 at 2:00
p.m.

Trial

August 15, 2016 at
8:30 a.m.

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

4

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

5

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

6

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

7

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

9

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

10

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

to grant a continuance.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 29, 2015

14
15
16

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2