Payne v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball et al

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Deadline to File Response In Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/23/2015. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/16/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 ROBERT C. HILLIARD (Pro Hac Vice) MARION REILLY (Pro Hac Vice) HILLIARD MUÑOZ GONZALES L.L.P. 719 S Shoreline Blvd., Suite #500 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Telephone: (361) 882-1612 Facsimile: (361) 882-3015 bobh@hmglawfirm.com marion@hmglawfirm.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) Anthea Grivas (Pro Hac Vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com antheag@hbsslaw.com KEKER & VAN NEST LLP JOHN W. KEKER - #49092 R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - #243780 THOMAS E. GORMAN - #279409 PHILIP J. TASSIN - #287787 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 jkeker@kvn.com alauridsen@kvn.com tgorman@kvn.com ptassin@kvn.com Attorneys for Defendants OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL (d/b/a MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL); and ROBERT D. MANFRED, JR. Attorneys for Plaintiff GAIL PAYNE 13 14 [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 GAIL PAYNE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. 3:15-cv-03229-SC 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 24 25 v. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL (d/b/a MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL); and ROBERT D. MANFRED, JR., Defendants. 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER C.A. NO. 3:15-CV-03229-SC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti Date Filed: October 15, 2015 1 Plaintiff Gail Payne and Defendants Office of the Commissioner of the Baseball (d/b/a 2 Major League Baseball) and Robert D. Manfred, Jr., by and through their undersigned counsel, 3 dispute and agree as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2015, Plaintiff filed her Original Complaint; 5 WHEREAS, on October 2, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Original 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b); WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s deadline to file her Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is currently October 16, 2015; WHEREAS, Plaintiff's deadline to file an Amended Complaint as a matter of right is October 23, 2015; WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed to withdraw their Motion to Dismiss the Original Complaint if Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint by October 23, 2015; WHEREAS, the parties believe that it would be inefficient to require Plaintiff to file her Response in Opposition before her deadline to file an Amended Complaint; 15 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that: 16 1. Plaintiff's Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from October 17 16, 2015 to October 23, 2015. 18 SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER C.A. NO. 3:15-CV-03229-SC -1- 1 DATED: October 15, 2015 HILLIARD MUÑOZ GONZALES L.L.P. 2 3 By 4 5 /s/ Robert C. Hilliard ROBERT C. HILLARD MARION M. REILLY Attorneys for Plaintiff GAIL PAYNE 6 7 8 DATED: October 15, 2015 By 9 10 /s/ Steve W. Berman STEVE W. BERMAN ANTHEA GRIVAS Attorneys for Plaintiff GAIL PAYNE 11 12 13 DATED: October 15, 2015 By 14 15 /s/ John W. Keker JOHN W. KEKER R. ADAM LAURIDSEN THOMAS E. GORMAN PHILIP J. TASSIN Attorneys for Defendants OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL (d/b/a MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL); and ROBERT D. MANFRED, JR. 16 17 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO A STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 Plaintiff's deadline to file her Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is 22 continued to October 23, 2015. 23 24 10/16/2015 Dated: ______________ 25 26 _________________________________ United States District Court Judge 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER C.A. NO. 3:15-CV-03229-SC -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?