Alfred H. Siegel v. Sony Corporation et al
Filing
14
Stipulation and Order Vacating Initial Case Management Conference and related deadlines. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/25/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143-RS
MDL No. 2143
14
This document relates to:
Case No. 3:15-cv-03248-RS
Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit
City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER VACATING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RELATED DEADLINES
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
Sony Corporation, et al.,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial
Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines
Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS
1
2
3
4
5
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2015, plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City
Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust (the “Trustee”), filed the above-captioned action;
WHEREAS, on that same day, the Trustee also filed a Notice of Related Case (Dkt. No.
3), seeking coordination of this action with MDL No. 2143 (Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS);
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2015, the Court entered an Order Setting Initial Case
6
Management Conference and ADR Deadlines in this action, which established certain ADR, meet
7
and confer, and Rule 26 deadlines for the parties, and also set this action for a Case Management
8
Conference on October 15, 2015 (Dkt. No. 7);
9
WHEREAS, the Court subsequently continued the date for the Case Management
10
Conference, and it is currently set for November 12, 2015 at 10:00 am (Dkt. No. 12); and
11
WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Defendants have conferred and agree that, for purposes
12
of judicial and party efficiency, it makes sense to coordinate any case management deadlines
13
and/or case management conferences in this action with MDL No. 2143 (3:10-md-2143-RS).
14
It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that:
15
1.
The Case Management Conference set for November 12, 2015 at 10:00 am, and
16
the related ADR, meet and confer, Rule 26 and case management deadlines set forth in the Order
17
Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, are hereby vacated, and this
18
action shall instead be coordinated with MDL No. 2143 (3:10-md-2143-RS).
19
20
21
22
2.
The Case Management Order Re Direct Action Plaintiff Cases (Dkt. No. 1352 in
Case No. 3:10-md-2143-RS) shall govern this action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: September 24, 2015
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
23
By
24
Daniel M. Wall
Belinda S Lee
Brendan A. McShane
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: 415-391-0600
Fax: 415-395-8095
25
26
27
28
/s/ Belinda S Lee
1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial
Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines
Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS
1
Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage
Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung
Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba
Corporation, and Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc.
2
3
4
5
Dated: September 24, 2015
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
6
By
7
John M. Taladay
Evan Werbel
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: (202) 639-7700
Facsimile: (202) 639-7890
8
9
10
Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V.,
Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital
Solutions Corporation and Philips & Lite-On
Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc.
11
12
13
14
/s/ John M. Taladay
Dated: September 24, 2015
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
15
By
16
John F. Cove, Jr.
Steven C. Holtzman
Kieran P. Ringgenberg
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 874-1000
Facsimile: (510) 874-1460
17
18
19
20
Attorneys for Defendants Sony Optiarc America
Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony Corp. and Sony
Electronics Inc.
21
22
23
/s/ John F. Cove, Jr.
Dated: September 24, 2015
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
24
By
25
Ian Simmons
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
1625 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 383-5300
Facsimile: (202) 383-5414
26
27
28
/s/ Ian Simmons
2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial
Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines
Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS
1
James M. Pearl
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 246-8434
Facsimile: (310) 246-6779
2
3
4
Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
5
6
Dated: September 24, 2015
7
KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP
By
8
/s/ Colleen M. Keating
Michael L. Tuchin
Robert J. Pfister
Colleen M. Keating
KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: 310-407-4000
Fax: 310-407-9090
9
10
11
12
Counsel for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee
for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
DATED: 9/25/15
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial
Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines
Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS
1
2
3
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule No. 5-1(i)(3), I declare that concurrence has been obtained
from each of the above signatories to file this document with the Court.
4
/s/ Belinda S Lee
BELINDA S LEE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial
Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines
Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?