Alfred H. Siegel v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 14

Stipulation and Order Vacating Initial Case Management Conference and related deadlines. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/25/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143-RS MDL No. 2143 14 This document relates to: Case No. 3:15-cv-03248-RS Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. Sony Corporation, et al., Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS 1 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2015, plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust (the “Trustee”), filed the above-captioned action; WHEREAS, on that same day, the Trustee also filed a Notice of Related Case (Dkt. No. 3), seeking coordination of this action with MDL No. 2143 (Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS); WHEREAS, on July 16, 2015, the Court entered an Order Setting Initial Case 6 Management Conference and ADR Deadlines in this action, which established certain ADR, meet 7 and confer, and Rule 26 deadlines for the parties, and also set this action for a Case Management 8 Conference on October 15, 2015 (Dkt. No. 7); 9 WHEREAS, the Court subsequently continued the date for the Case Management 10 Conference, and it is currently set for November 12, 2015 at 10:00 am (Dkt. No. 12); and 11 WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Defendants have conferred and agree that, for purposes 12 of judicial and party efficiency, it makes sense to coordinate any case management deadlines 13 and/or case management conferences in this action with MDL No. 2143 (3:10-md-2143-RS). 14 It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that: 15 1. The Case Management Conference set for November 12, 2015 at 10:00 am, and 16 the related ADR, meet and confer, Rule 26 and case management deadlines set forth in the Order 17 Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, are hereby vacated, and this 18 action shall instead be coordinated with MDL No. 2143 (3:10-md-2143-RS). 19 20 21 22 2. The Case Management Order Re Direct Action Plaintiff Cases (Dkt. No. 1352 in Case No. 3:10-md-2143-RS) shall govern this action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: September 24, 2015 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 23 By 24 Daniel M. Wall Belinda S Lee Brendan A. McShane LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: 415-391-0600 Fax: 415-395-8095 25 26 27 28 /s/ Belinda S Lee 1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS 1 Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 2 3 4 5 Dated: September 24, 2015 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 6 By 7 John M. Taladay Evan Werbel BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 639-7700 Facsimile: (202) 639-7890 8 9 10 Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. 11 12 13 14 /s/ John M. Taladay Dated: September 24, 2015 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 15 By 16 John F. Cove, Jr. Steven C. Holtzman Kieran P. Ringgenberg Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 17 18 19 20 Attorneys for Defendants Sony Optiarc America Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony Corp. and Sony Electronics Inc. 21 22 23 /s/ John F. Cove, Jr. Dated: September 24, 2015 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 24 By 25 Ian Simmons O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 383-5300 Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 26 27 28 /s/ Ian Simmons 2 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS 1 James M. Pearl O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 246-8434 Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 2 3 4 Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 5 6 Dated: September 24, 2015 7 KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP By 8 /s/ Colleen M. Keating Michael L. Tuchin Robert J. Pfister Colleen M. Keating KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Thirty-Ninth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel: 310-407-4000 Fax: 310-407-9090 9 10 11 12 Counsel for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust 13 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 DATED: 9/25/15 HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS 1 2 3 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING Pursuant to Civil Local Rule No. 5-1(i)(3), I declare that concurrence has been obtained from each of the above signatories to file this document with the Court. 4 /s/ Belinda S Lee BELINDA S LEE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Vacating Initial Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines Case Nos. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?