Alfred H. Siegel v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Deadline to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/2/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580)
[e-mail]
Belinda S Lee (Bar No. 199635)
[e-mail]
Brendan A. McShane (Bar No. 227501)
[e-mail]
Christopher B. Campbell (Bar No. 254776)
[e-mail]
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095
Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage
Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung
Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba
Corporation, and Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc.
[Additional Parties and Counsel Listed on Signature
Page]

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 2143
This document relates to:

Case No. 3:15-cv-03248-RS

Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit
City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26

Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143-RS

v.
Sony Corporation, et al.,
Defendants.

27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding
Deadline To Respond To Complaint
MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

1
2

WHEREAS, on July 13, 2015, plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City
Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust (the “Trustee”) filed the above-captioned action;

3

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2015, the Court approved the Parties’ stipulation setting the

4

date for any response to the Complaint as 90 days from the date of service of process (Dkt. No.

5

10);

6

WHEREAS, Defendants received service of process on different dates, and therefore

7

Defendants’ responses to the Complaint are currently due as early as November 3 and as late as

8

November 24;

9

WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Defendants have conferred and agree that, for purposes

10

of judicial and party efficiency, it makes sense to coordinate a single date for Defendants’

11

responses to the Complaint.

12

It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that:

13

1.

14
15

All Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before

November 13, 2015.
2.

If any motions to dismiss are filed, Plaintiff’s opposition shall be due 60 days after

16

the filing of any said motion to dismiss, and any reply shall be due 30 days after the filing of

17

Plaintiff’s opposition.

18

3.

This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Defendants of any defense,

19

including but not limited to those defenses provided under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil

20

Procedure.

21
22

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: November 2, 2015

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

23

By

24

Daniel M. Wall
Belinda S Lee
Brendan A. McShane
Christopher B. Campbell
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1

25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

/s/ Belinda S Lee

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding
Deadline To Respond To Complaint
MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

1
Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage
Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung
Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba
Corporation, and Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc.

2
3
4
5

Dated: November 2, 2015

6

By

7

/s/ John M. Taladay

John M. Taladay
Evan Werbel
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11

Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V.,
Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital
Solutions Corporation and Philips & Lite-On
Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc.

12
13
14

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

Dated: November 2, 2015

15

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
By

16

/s/ John F. Cove, Jr.

John F. Cove, Jr.
Steven C. Holtzman
Kieran P. Ringgenberg
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendants Sony Optiarc America
Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony Corp. and Sony
Electronics Inc.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Dated: November 2, 2015

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By

/s/ Ian Simmons

Ian Simmons
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
1625 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding
Deadline To Respond To Complaint
MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

1
James M. Pearl
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

6
7

Dated: November 2, 2015

KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP

8

By

9

Michael L. Tuchin
Robert J. Pfister
Colleen M. Keating
KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

10
11
12
13

/s/ Colleen M. Keating

Counsel for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee
for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust

14
15
16
17
18

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule No. 5-1(i)(3), I declare that concurrence has been obtained
from each of the above signatories to file this document with the Court.

19
/s/ Belinda S Lee
BELINDA S LEE

20
21
22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26

DATED: 11/2/15

HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28
3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding
Deadline To Respond To Complaint
MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS