Alfred H. Siegel v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/8/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2016)

Download PDF
KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS, THIRTY-NINTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 TELEPHONE: 310-407-4000 David M. Stern (State Bar No. 67697) 1 Michael L. Tuchin (State Bar No. 150375) Robert J. Pfister (State Bar No. 241370) 2 Colleen M. Keating (State Bar No. 261213) Jonathan M. Weiss (State Bar No. 281217) 3 KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Thirty-Ninth Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: 310-407-4000 5 Facsimile: 310-407-9090 Email: dstern@ktbslaw.com 6 mtuchin@ktbslaw.com rpfister@ktbslaw.com 7 ckeating@ktbslaw.com jweiss@ktbslaw.com 8 Steven T. Gubner (State Bar No. 156593) 9 Jason B. Komorsky (State Bar No. 155677) Michael W. Davis (State Bar No. 274126) 10 BRUTZKUS GUBNER ROZANSKY SEROR WEBER LLP 21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 500 11 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: 818-827-9000 12 Facsimile: 818-827-9099 Email: sgubner@brutkusgubner.com 13 jkomorsky@brutkusgubner.com mdavis@brutkusgubner.com 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee 15 for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION 20 Case No. 3:15-cv-03248 RS 21 This document relates to: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT 22 Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust, 23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 Sony Corporation, et al., 26 Defendants. 27 28 Master File No. 3:10-md-2143 RS 1 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2015, plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, in his capacity as Trustee for the 2 Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust (“Plaintiff”), filed his Complaint for Damages [Docket 3 No. 1] in the above-captioned action; 4 WHEREAS, on August 6, 2015, the Court entered the Stipulation and Order Regarding 5 Service of Process and Deadlines to Respond to Complaint [Docket No. 11], under which 6 defendants had ninety (90) days from the date of service of process to answer or otherwise respond 7 to the Complaint; 8 WHEREAS, on November 2, 2015, the Court entered the Stipulation and Order Regarding 9 Deadline to Respond to Complaint [Docket No. 16], which set a single date (November 13, 2015) KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS, THIRTY-NINTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 TELEPHONE: 310-407-4000 10 as the deadline for all defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, and further 11 provided that Plaintiff’s opposition to any motions to dismiss that were filed would be due sixty 12 (60) days after the filing of such motions, with replies due thirty (30) days thereafter; 13 WHEREAS, on November 13, 2015, defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint 14 [Docket Nos. 17, 18, 19] (the “Motions to Dismiss”), with a specified hearing date of February 18, 15 2016, at 1:30 p.m.; 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motions to Dismiss is currently due on January 17 12, 2016, and defendants’ replies in further support of the Motions to Dismiss are currently due 18 February 11, 2016; 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has proposed to amend his Complaint, and the parties are discussing 20 whether defendants will consent to such amendment; and 21 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree that, for purposes of judicial and party 22 efficiency, the deadline to oppose the Motions to Dismiss should be extended for two weeks so 23 that the parties may continue to confer regarding Plaintiff’s proposed First Amended Complaint. 24 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court 25 approval, that: 26 1. Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motions to Dismiss [Docket Nos. 17, 18, 19] shall be 27 due on January 26, 2016. 28 1 STIPULATION RE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case No. 3:15-cv-03248 RS 1 2. Replies in further support of the Motions to Dismiss shall be due February 25, 3. A hearing on the Motions to Dismiss shall be held on the earliest date that is 2 2016. 3 4 convenient to the Court. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 DATED: January 8, 2016 KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 8 9 KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS, THIRTY-NINTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 TELEPHONE: 310-407-4000 10 11 /s/ Colleen M. Keating Colleen M. Keating Attorneys for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust 12 13 DATED: January 8, 2016 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 /s/ Belinda S Lee Belinda S Lee Brendan A. McShane 505 Montgomery Street Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Tel.: 415-395-8164 Fax: 415-395-8095 Belinda.Lee@lw.com Brendan.McShane@lw.com Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp., and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION RE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case No. 3:15-cv-03248 RS 1 2 DATED: January 8, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 3 4 /s/ Ian Simmons Ian Simmons 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-4001 Tel.: 202-383-5106 Fax: 202-383-5414 isimmons@omm.com 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 9 KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS, THIRTY-NINTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 TELEPHONE: 310-407-4000 10 11 DATED: January 8, 2016 BAKER BOTTS LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 /s/ Evan Werbel Evan Werbel 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20004-2400 Tel.: 202-639-1323 Fax: 202-585-4077 evan.werbel@bakerbotts.com Attorneys for Defendants Lite-On IT Corp., Lite-On Sales & Distribution Inc., Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corp., and Philips & LiteOn Digital Solutions USA, Inc. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION RE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case No. 3:15-cv-03248 RS 1 2 DATED: January 8, 2016 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 3 4 /s/ John F. Cove, Jr. John F. Cove, Jr. Steven C. Holtzman 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel.: 510-874-1002 Fax: 510-874-1460 jcove@bsfllp.com sholtzman@bsfllp.com 5 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants Sony Optiarc America Inc., Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Corporation, and Sony Optiarc Inc. KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP 1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS, THIRTY-NINTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 TELEPHONE: 310-407-4000 10 11 12 13 14 ATTESTATION 15 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 16 document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 17 18 DATED: January 8, 2016 /s/ Colleen M. Keating Colleen M. Keating 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 DATED: _______________, 2016 1/8 23 24 25 Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION RE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case No. 3:15-cv-03248 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?