Dixon v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.

Filing 49

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO STRIKE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 17, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EDITH DIXON,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

9
10

MONTEREY FINANCIAL SERVICES,
INC.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 15-cv-03298-MMC
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO
STRIKE

Defendant.

12
13

Before the Court is defendant Monterey Financial Services, Inc.'s "Motion for

14

Summary Judgment [and] to Strike Plaintiff's Class Allegations," filed May 13, 2016.

15

Plaintiff Edith Dixon has filed opposition, to which defendant has replied. Having read

16

and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court

17

deems the matter suitable for determination on the parties' respective written

18

submissions, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for June 24, 2016.1

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated: June 17, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

In light thereof, defendant's "Motion on Consent to Appear Telephonically for Oral
Argument on its Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Class
Allegations," filed June 13, 2016, is hereby DENIED as moot. For future reference,
defendant is advised that, although the Court may conduct case management
conferences by telephone for good cause shown, the Court does not hear disputed
motions telephonically.