Bain et al v. United Healthcare Inc., et al
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE FILING OF PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND TO THE DISMISSAL OF UNITED HEALTHCARE INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by Alaina Bain, Danya Bain, David Bain. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/23/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2017)
1
2
3
4
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
Nicholas A. Carlin, Cal. Bar No. 112532
nac@phillaw.com
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 94129
415-398-0900 (tel)
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP
Joseph A. Creitz, Cal. Bar No. 169552
joe@creitzserebin.com
Lisa S. Serebin, Cal. Bar No. 146312
lisa@creitzserebin.com
250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.466.3090 (tel)
415.513.4475 (fax)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
DAVID BAIN, ALAINA BAIN, and
DAYNA BAIN, individuals,
20
21
22
23
24
Case No.: 15-cv-3305-EMC
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED HEALTHCARE INC., et
al.,
Defendants.
25
JOINT STIPULATION TO
AMEND COMPLAINT AND
FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT UNITED
HEALTHCARE INC. WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, and
[proposed] ORDER
26
27
28
Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC
STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER
1
1
2
3
Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure all
parties hereby stipulate
(1) to the filing of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, attached as
4
Exhibit A hereto and filed herewith, to name OXFORD HEALTH
5
INSURANCE, INC. and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH as defendants;
6
(2) to the dismissal without prejudice of original Defendant UNITED
7
8
9
10
11
HEALTHCARE INC.;
(3) that Defendants waive notice and service of the amended
complaint;
(4) no current outstanding discovery or discovery disputes will be
affected by the foregoing amendment and dismissal; and
12
(5) that the Answer(s) of newly named Defendants OXFORD
13
HEALTH INSURANCE and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH shall be
14
due within 20 calendar days following the date of filing hereof.
15
16
Dated: March 22, 2017
17
/s/ Joseph A. Creitz
Joseph A. Creitz,
CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP
18
/s/ Nicholas A. Carlin
Nicholas A. Carlin,
19
20
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP
21
Counsel for Plaintiffs
22
23
24
25
26
Dated: March 22, 2017
/s/ Timonthy J. Nally
Timothy J. Nally
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP
Counsel for Defendant United
27
28
Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC
STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER
2
1
ATTESTATION
2
3
4
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing
of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
5
6
Dated: March 22, 2017
/s/ Joseph A. Creitz
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC
STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER
3
[proposed] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
1
2
3
4
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing,
the court hereby orders as follows:
(1) Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A to said
5
stipulation shall be deemed filed as of the date upon which it was
6
electronically filed;
7
8
(2) Defendant UNITED HEALTHCARE INC. is hereby dismissed
without prejudice;
9
(3) Defendants waive notice and service of the amended complaint;
10
(4) Any current outstanding discovery or discovery disputes will be
11
unaffected by the foregoing; and
12
(5) The Answer(s) of newly named Defendants OXFORD HEALTH
13
INSURANCE and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH shall be due within
14
20 calendar days following the date of filing of the aforementioned
15
stipulation.
S
18
Dated:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
en
ER
H
22
23
Ch
LI
RT
21
dw
Judge E
FO
ard M.
NO
20
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
19
3/23/17
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
17
RT
U
O
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
24
25
26
27
28
Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC
STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?