Bain et al v. United Healthcare Inc., et al

Filing 65

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE FILING OF PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND TO THE DISMISSAL OF UNITED HEALTHCARE INC WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by Alaina Bain, Danya Bain, David Bain. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/23/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP Nicholas A. Carlin, Cal. Bar No. 112532 nac@phillaw.com 39 Mesa Street, Suite 201 San Francisco, CA 94129 415-398-0900 (tel) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP Joseph A. Creitz, Cal. Bar No. 169552 joe@creitzserebin.com Lisa S. Serebin, Cal. Bar No. 146312 lisa@creitzserebin.com 250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 415.466.3090 (tel) 415.513.4475 (fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 DAVID BAIN, ALAINA BAIN, and DAYNA BAIN, individuals, 20 21 22 23 24 Case No.: 15-cv-3305-EMC Plaintiff, v. UNITED HEALTHCARE INC., et al., Defendants. 25 JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT UNITED HEALTHCARE INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and [proposed] ORDER 26 27 28 Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER 1 1 2 3 Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure all parties hereby stipulate (1) to the filing of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, attached as 4 Exhibit A hereto and filed herewith, to name OXFORD HEALTH 5 INSURANCE, INC. and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH as defendants; 6 (2) to the dismissal without prejudice of original Defendant UNITED 7 8 9 10 11 HEALTHCARE INC.; (3) that Defendants waive notice and service of the amended complaint; (4) no current outstanding discovery or discovery disputes will be affected by the foregoing amendment and dismissal; and 12 (5) that the Answer(s) of newly named Defendants OXFORD 13 HEALTH INSURANCE and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH shall be 14 due within 20 calendar days following the date of filing hereof. 15 16 Dated: March 22, 2017 17 /s/ Joseph A. Creitz Joseph A. Creitz, CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP 18 /s/ Nicholas A. Carlin Nicholas A. Carlin, 19 20 PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP 21 Counsel for Plaintiffs 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: March 22, 2017 /s/ Timonthy J. Nally Timothy J. Nally LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP Counsel for Defendant United 27 28 Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER 2 1 ATTESTATION 2 3 4 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 5 6 Dated: March 22, 2017 /s/ Joseph A. Creitz Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER 3 [proposed] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 1 2 3 4 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the court hereby orders as follows: (1) Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A to said 5 stipulation shall be deemed filed as of the date upon which it was 6 electronically filed; 7 8 (2) Defendant UNITED HEALTHCARE INC. is hereby dismissed without prejudice; 9 (3) Defendants waive notice and service of the amended complaint; 10 (4) Any current outstanding discovery or discovery disputes will be 11 unaffected by the foregoing; and 12 (5) The Answer(s) of newly named Defendants OXFORD HEALTH 13 INSURANCE and UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH shall be due within 14 20 calendar days following the date of filing of the aforementioned 15 stipulation. S 18 Dated: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE en ER H 22 23 Ch LI RT 21 dw Judge E FO ard M. NO 20 DERED O OR IT IS S A 19 3/23/17 R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 17 RT U O 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 24 25 26 27 28 Bain v. United, 15-cv-3305-EMC STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL and [proposed] ORDER 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?