Bain et al v. United Healthcare Inc., et al

Filing 76

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE re 74 filed by United Healthcare Inc., Motions terminated: 68 MOTION to Stay filed by Alaina Bain, Danya Bain, David Bain, 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed b y United Healthcare Inc. Case Management Statement due by 11/22/2017. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/30/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/13/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2017)

Download PDF
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 1 GREG L. JOHNSON, SB# 132397 E-Mail: Greg.Johnson@lewisbrisbois.com 2 TIMOTHY J. NALLY, SB# 288728 E-Mail: Timothy.Nally@lewisbrisbois.com 3 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 700 Sacramento, California 95833 4 Telephone: 916.564.5400 Facsimile: 916.564.5444 5 Attorneys for Defendant, 6 UNITED HEALTHCARE INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 DAVID BAIN, DAYNA BAIN and ALAINA BAIN, individuals, , 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC. and 15 UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, in their capacities as insurers, administrators, and 16 fiduciaries of the Sagent Advisors Inc. Group Health Plan, an ERISA-regulated welfare plan, 17 Defendants. 18 CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03305-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO WITHDRAW DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION (DKT. 71) TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY (DKT. 68) AND TO STAY THE LITIGATION Trial Date: None Set 19 20 Plaintiffs David Bain, Dayna Bain, and Alaina Bain (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and 21 Defendants Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. and United Behavioral Health (collectively, 22 “Defendants”) do hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 23 24 RECITALS WHEREAS, on April 4, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Stay Action and Alternative 25 Motion to Continue Summary Judgment Schedule (“the Motion for Stay”), which is presently 26 scheduled to be heard on April 13, 2017 (see Dkt. 68); 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion requests, inter alia, that this Court stay the above-captioned 28 4818-2301-3958.1 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION 1 litigation until November 16, 2017, in light of the pending matters of Wit v. United Behavioral 2 Health, N.D. Cal. Case No. 14-cv-02346-JCS, and Alexander v. United Behavioral Health, N.D. 3 Cal. Case No. 14-cv-05337-JCS (collectively, “Wit”); 4 WHEREAS, Defendants filed an opposition on April 7, 2017 (see Dkt. 71), and Plaintiffs 5 filed a reply on April 10, 2017 (see Dkt. 73); 6 WHEREAS, Defendants contend that if a judgment is entered with respect to the class 7 currently certified in Wit, such judgment will preclude all of the claims currently asserted by 8 Plaintiffs in the above-captioned action in their entirety, subject to any opt-out rights; 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs dispute Defendants’ contention for multiple reasons, including, but 10 not limited to, the fact that the instant lawsuit includes multiple claims not raised or contemplated 11 to be adjudicated in Wit, and that will not be resolved by Wit, including but not limited to claims 12 concerning the adequacy and propriety of Defendant’s termination of benefits Plaintiff Alaina 13 Bain’s residential treatment under ERISA and the ERISA claims regulation, claims for monetary 14 benefits, claims for penalties under ERISA § 502(c), and otherwise (whereas, by contrast, Wit is 15 expressly seeking only re-adjudication – not monetary benefits – of claims denied based on an 16 allegedly improper Level of Care Guideline); and neither a judgment nor a settlement in a class 17 action such as Wit resolves or produce a waiver or release of claims outside the scope of those 18 actually litigated. See National Super Spuds v. N.Y Mercantile Exchange, 660 F.2d 9, 18 (2d Cir. 19 1981); and 20 WHEREAS, despite their differing positions on these issues, all parties believe that the 21 requested stay is appropriate; 22 23 STIPULATION THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, Defendants hereby withdraw 24 their opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay, and Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate and 25 agree that the above-captioned litigation should be stayed until November 16, 2017, as requested 26 in Plaintiffs’ Motion for Stay. 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW The undersigned, on behalf of their respective clients, do so stipulate. 28 4818-2301-3958.1 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION 3:15-cv-03305-EMC 1 Respectfully submitted. 2 DATED: April 11, 2017 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 3 4 By: 5 6 7 /s/ Greg L. Johnson Greg L. Johnson Timothy J. Nally Attorneys for Defendants OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE, INC. AND UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 8 9 DATED: April 11, 2017 10 PHILIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP 11 By: 12 13 14 /s/ Joseph Creitz Joseph Creitz Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs DAVID BAIN, DAYNA BAIN and ALAINA BAIN 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 4818-2301-3958.1 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION 3:15-cv-03305-EMC 1 2 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 3 document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 4 5 Dated: April 11, 2017 /s/ Greg L. Johnson Greg L. Johnson Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 4818-2301-3958.1 4 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION 3:15-cv-03305-EMC 1 ORDER UPON STIPULATION 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Court hereby stays 3 the above-captioned litigation until November 16, 2017, as requested in the Motion to Stay (Dkt. 4 68). It is so ORDERD. 6 DATED: 4/13/2017 S UNIT ED RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO 11 NO J ER 14 A H 13 . Chen ward M udge Ed LI RT 12 R NIA 7 The 4/13/17 hearing is vacated. Further CMC is reset from 5/25/17 to 11/30/17 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC statement shall be filed by 11/22/17. FO 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 4818-2301-3958.1 5 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION 3:15-cv-03305-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?