Von Bozzay v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Filing 20

ORDER GRANTING re 19 Third Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer filed by Nationstar Mortgage LLC. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/18/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN ( State Bar No. 180203) mks@ severson.com 2 MEGAN C. KELLY ( State Bar No. 251293) mck@ severson.com 3 SEVERSON & W ERSON A Professional Corporation 4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: ( 415)398-3344 Facsimile: ( 415)956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage 7 LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 GEORGE VON BOZZAY, Case No. CV-15-3376 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 61 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff GEORGE VON BOZZAY (Plaintiff” “ )and Defendant NATIONSTAR 18 MORTGAGE LLC (Defendant” “ )hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 19 W HEREAS, Plaintiff filed the complaint initiating the above-referenced action on J 22, uly 20 2015; 21 W HEREAS, Plaintiff served the complaint on Defendant on J 24, 2015; uly 22 W HEREAS, based on the J 24, 2015 service date, Defendant’ deadline to respond to uly s 23 the complaint was originally August 14, 2015; 24 W HEREAS, on or about August 13, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’ s 25 deadline to respond to the complaint to August 28, 2015; 26 W HEREAS, on August 14, 2015, the Court issued an Order referring the case to the ADR 27 Unit for an assessment telephone conference. That telephone conference was scheduled for 28 September 11, 2015; CV-15-3376 THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO S N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/ 5007677.1 1 W HEREAS, on August 25, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’ deadline to s 2 respond to the complaint to September 28, 2015; 3 W HEREAS, on September 11, 2015, the parties attended the ADR teleconference and in 4 light of the parties existing efforts to determine whether there may be the potential for an informal 5 resolution, a further teleconference was scheduled for October 29, 2015. 6 W HEREAS, the parties continue to explore whether there may be the potential for an 7 informal resolution; 8 W HEREAS, in order to continue in these settlement negotiations, reduce the costs of 9 litigation for all parties, and unburden the Court’ docket, counsel for the parties’have met and s 10 conferred and agreed to a further thirty ( 30)day extension of the deadline for Defendant to 11 respond to the complaint; 12 W HEREAS the req uest will have no effect on the case schedule, as no trial schedule has 13 been set and the Case Management Conference is not until October 30, 2015. 14 Based on the foregoing and pursuant to N.D. Local Rule 6-1, it is hereby STIPULATED: 15 Defendant shall have up to and including October 28, 2015 to respond to the complaint. 16 DATED: September 15, 2015 MELLEN LAW FIRM 17 18 By: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 /s/ Sarah Shapero Sarah Shapero Attorneys for Plaintiff George Von Boz ay z I, Megan C. Kelly, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6- I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff, Sarah 1. Shapero, has concurred in this filing. /s/ Megan C. Kelly 26 27 28 CV-15-3376 2 THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO S N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/ 5007677.1 1 DATED: September 15, 2015 2 SEVERSON & W ERSON A Professional Corporation 3 By: 4 /s/ Megan C. Kelly Megan C. Kelly 5 Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC 6 7 8 Dated: September 18, 2015 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Joseph C. Spero, Chief Magistrate Judge. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CV-15-3376 3 THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO S N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/ 5007677.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?