Von Bozzay v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING re 19 Third Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer filed by Nationstar Mortgage LLC. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/18/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2015)
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (
State Bar No. 180203)
mks@ severson.com
2 MEGAN C. KELLY (
State Bar No. 251293)
mck@ severson.com
3 SEVERSON & W ERSON
A Professional Corporation
4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
5 Telephone: (
415)398-3344
Facsimile: (
415)956-0439
6
Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage
7 LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
GEORGE VON BOZZAY,
Case No. CV-15-3376
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
S
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R.
61
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff GEORGE VON BOZZAY (Plaintiff”
“
)and Defendant NATIONSTAR
18 MORTGAGE LLC (Defendant”
“
)hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
19
W HEREAS, Plaintiff filed the complaint initiating the above-referenced action on J 22,
uly
20 2015;
21
W HEREAS, Plaintiff served the complaint on Defendant on J 24, 2015;
uly
22
W HEREAS, based on the J 24, 2015 service date, Defendant’ deadline to respond to
uly
s
23 the complaint was originally August 14, 2015;
24
W HEREAS, on or about August 13, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’
s
25 deadline to respond to the complaint to August 28, 2015;
26
W HEREAS, on August 14, 2015, the Court issued an Order referring the case to the ADR
27 Unit for an assessment telephone conference. That telephone conference was scheduled for
28 September 11, 2015;
CV-15-3376
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
S
N.D. L.R. 6-1
11951.0644/
5007677.1
1
W HEREAS, on August 25, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’ deadline to
s
2 respond to the complaint to September 28, 2015;
3
W HEREAS, on September 11, 2015, the parties attended the ADR teleconference and in
4 light of the parties existing efforts to determine whether there may be the potential for an informal
5 resolution, a further teleconference was scheduled for October 29, 2015.
6
W HEREAS, the parties continue to explore whether there may be the potential for an
7 informal resolution;
8
W HEREAS, in order to continue in these settlement negotiations, reduce the costs of
9 litigation for all parties, and unburden the Court’ docket, counsel for the parties’have met and
s
10 conferred and agreed to a further thirty (
30)day extension of the deadline for Defendant to
11 respond to the complaint;
12
W HEREAS the req
uest will have no effect on the case schedule, as no trial schedule has
13 been set and the Case Management Conference is not until October 30, 2015.
14
Based on the foregoing and pursuant to N.D. Local Rule 6-1, it is hereby STIPULATED:
15 Defendant shall have up to and including October 28, 2015 to respond to the complaint.
16 DATED: September 15, 2015
MELLEN LAW FIRM
17
18
By:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
/s/ Sarah Shapero
Sarah Shapero
Attorneys for Plaintiff George Von Boz ay
z
I, Megan C. Kelly, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO
S
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6- I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff, Sarah
1.
Shapero, has concurred in this filing.
/s/ Megan C. Kelly
26
27
28
CV-15-3376
2
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
S
N.D. L.R. 6-1
11951.0644/
5007677.1
1 DATED: September 15, 2015
2
SEVERSON & W ERSON
A Professional Corporation
3
By:
4
/s/ Megan C. Kelly
Megan C. Kelly
5
Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC
6
7
8
Dated: September 18, 2015
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Joseph C. Spero, Chief Magistrate Judge.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CV-15-3376
3
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
S
N.D. L.R. 6-1
11951.0644/
5007677.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?