Von Bozzay v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Filing 32

ORDER GRANTING re 31 Fifth Stipulation filed by Nationstar Mortgage LLC to Extend Defendant's Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/30/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203) mks@severson.com 2 MEGAN C. KELLY (State Bar No. 251293) mck@severson.com 3 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage 7 LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 GEORGE VON BOZZAY, Case No. CV-15-3376 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 FIFTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff GEORGE VON BOZZAY (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant NATIONSTAR 18 MORTGAGE LLC (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the complaint initiating the above-referenced action on July 22, 20 2015; 21 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the complaint on Defendant on July 24, 2015; 22 WHEREAS, based on the July 24, 2015 service date, Defendant’s deadline to respond to 23 the complaint was originally August 14, 2015; 24 WHEREAS, on or about August 14, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s 25 deadline to respond to the complaint to August 28, 2015; 26 WHEREAS, on August 14, 2015, the Court issued an Order referring the case to the ADR 27 Unit for an assessment telephone conference on September 11, 2015; 28 WHEREAS, August 25, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s deadline to CV-15-3376 FIFTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/5781914.1 1 respond to the complaint to September 28, 2015. 2 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2015, the parties attended the ADR teleconference and in 3 light of the parties existing efforts to determine whether there may be the potential for an informal 4 resolution, a further teleconference was scheduled for October 29, 2015. The parties appeared but 5 the ADR Program representative did not join. 6 WHEREAS, on or about September 15, 2015 the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s 7 deadline to respond to the complaint to October 28, 2015; 8 WHEREAS, on or about October 21, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s 9 deadline to respond to the complaint to November 27, 2015; 10 WHEREAS, on November 6, 2015, the parties attended a case management conference at 11 which time the Court referred the parties to another ADR Program phone conference to occur 12 within sixty (60) days and set a further case management conference for February 12, 2016. 13 WHEREAS, an ADR Program phone conference has been scheduled for December 16, 14 2015. 15 WHEREAS, no trial schedule has been set. 16 WHEREAS, the parties continue to explore whether there may be the potential for an 17 informal resolution; 18 WHEREAS, in order to continue in these informal resolution discussions, reduce the costs 19 of litigation for all parties, and unburden the Court’s docket, counsel for the parties’ have met and 20 conferred and agreed to a further thirty (30) day extension of the deadline for Defendant to 21 respond to the complaint. This is the parties’ fifth such stipulation. 22 Based on the foregoing and pursuant to N.D. Local Rule 6-1, it is hereby STIPULATED: 23 Defendant shall have up to and including December 28, 2015 to respond to the complaint. 24 25 26 27 28 CV-15-3376 2 FIFTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/5781914.1 1 DATED: November 24, 2015 MELLEN LAW FIRM 2 3 By: /s/ Sarah Shapero Sarah Shapero 4 5 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff George Von Bozzay I, Megan C. Kelly, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1. I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff, Sarah Shapero, has concurred in this filing. /s/ Megan C. Kelly 10 11 12 DATED: November 24, 2015 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 13 14 15 By: /s/ Megan C. Kelly Megan C. Kelly 16 seph C. NO 21 Judge Jo Spero H ER LI RT 22 23 R NIA S Dated: 11/30/15 D RDERE OO IT IS S A 20 UNIT ED 19 RT U O 18 Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 17 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 CV-15-3376 3 FIFTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/5781914.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?