Von Bozzay v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING re 33 Sixth Stipulation to Extend Defendant's Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Nationstar Mortgage LLC. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/18/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203) mks@severson.com 2 MEGAN C. KELLY (State Bar No. 251293) mck@severson.com 3 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage 7 LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 GEORGE VON BOZZAY, Case No. CV-15-3376 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff GEORGE VON BOZZAY (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant NATIONSTAR 18 MORTGAGE LLC (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the complaint initiating the above-referenced action on July 22, 20 2015; 21 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the complaint on Defendant on July 24, 2015; 22 WHEREAS, based on the July 24, 2015 service date, Defendant’s deadline to respond to 23 the complaint was originally August 14, 2015; 24 WHEREAS, on or about August 14, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s 25 deadline to respond to the complaint to August 28, 2015; 26 WHEREAS, on August 14, 2015, the Court issued an Order referring the case to the ADR 27 Unit for an assessment telephone conference on September 11, 2015; 28 WHEREAS, August 25, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s deadline to CV-15-3376 SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/6019381.1 1 respond to the complaint to September 28, 2015. 2 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2015, the parties attended the ADR teleconference and in 3 light of the parties existing efforts to determine whether there may be the potential for an informal 4 resolution, a further teleconference was scheduled for October 29, 2015. 5 WHEREAS, on or about September 15, 2015 the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s 6 deadline to respond to the complaint to October 28, 2015; 7 WHEREAS, on October 29, 2015, the parties appeared for the further ADR teleconference, 8 however the ADR Program representative did not join. 9 WHEREAS, on or about October 21, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend Defendant’s 10 deadline to respond to the complaint to November 27, 2015; 11 WHEREAS, on November 6, 2015, the parties attended a case management conference at 12 which time the Court referred the parties to another ADR Program phone conference to occur 13 within sixty (60) days and set a further case management conference for February 12, 2016. 14 WHEREAS, on December 16, 2015, the parties attended a further ADR teleconference and 15 discussed the fact that the parties continue to work together to determine whether an informal 16 resolution will be possible. A further ADR teleconference was scheduled for January 27, 2016. 17 WHEREAS, no trial schedule has been set. 18 WHEREAS, as stated above, the parties continue to explore whether there may be the 19 potential for an informal resolution; 20 WHEREAS, in order to continue in these informal resolution discussions, reduce the costs 21 of litigation for all parties, and unburden the Court’s docket, counsel for the parties’ have met and 22 conferred and agreed to a further thirty (30) day extension of the deadline for Defendant to 23 respond to the complaint. This is the parties’ sixth such stipulation. 24 Based on the foregoing and pursuant to N.D. Local Rule 6-1, it is hereby STIPULATED: 25 Defendant shall have up to and including January 27, 2016 to respond to the complaint. 26 27 28 CV-15-3376 2 SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/6019381.1 1 DATED: December 16, 2015 MELLEN LAW FIRM 2 3 By: 4 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Sarah Shapero Sarah Shapero Attorneys for Plaintiff George Von Bozzay I, Megan C. Kelly, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1. I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff, Sarah Shapero, has concurred in this filing. /s/ Megan C. Kelly 10 11 12 DATED: December 16, 2015 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 13 14 15 By: 16 Judge Jo Spero RT A H ER 21 R NIA seph C. NO 20 ERED FO Dated: 12/18/15 O ORD IT IS S LI 19 UNIT ED 18 Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 17 /s/ Megan C. Kelly Megan C. Kelly N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CV-15-3376 3 SIXTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO N.D. L.R. 6-1 11951.0644/6019381.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?