RPM Mortgage, Inc. v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
Filing
20
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/12/2015 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 11/4/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/29/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RPM MORTGAGE, INC.,
Case No. 15-cv-03380-MEJ
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
9
10
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Plaintiff RPM Mortgage, Inc. (“RPM”) brings a Complaint for Declaratory Relief against
14
Defendant SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (“SunTrust”), seeking a judicial determination that it has no
15
obligation to indemnify SunTrust for its losses relating to loans underwritten by NL, Inc. After
16
SunTrust moved to dismiss for forum non conveniens or transfer venue, the Court denied
17
SunTrust’s Motion without prejudice, finding a more developed record regarding the nature of NL
18
and RPM’s relationship would help reveal whether transfer is appropriate. Dkt. No. 18. The
19
Court directed the parties to engage in limited discovery regarding NL and RPM’s relationship, to
20
be completed by October 15, 2015, and provide a discovery status report as part of their joint case
21
management statement. Id.
22
As the parties did not file a joint statement by October 15, the Court vacated the October
23
22, 2015 Case Management Conference and ordered the parties to file a joint status report by
24
October 27, 2015. Dkt. No. 19. No response has been received. Accordingly, the Court hereby
25
ORDERS Plaintiff RPM Mortgage, Inc. to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for
26
failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. RPM shall e-file a declaration by
27
November 4, 2015 (no chambers copy is required). If a responsive declaration is filed, the Court
28
shall either issue an order based on the declaration or conduct a hearing on November 12, 2015 at
1
10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
2
Notice is hereby provided to RPM that the Court may dismiss this case without a hearing if no
3
responsive declaration is filed. Thus, it is imperative that the Court receive a written response by
4
the deadline above.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
Dated: October 29, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?