Holmby v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER 31 Joint Notice of Tentative Settlement and Joint Request to Vacate Existing Dates. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/21/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2016)
6
MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 90058)
Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. (SBN 226326)
Tina Mehr, Esq. (SBN 226326)
29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208
Agoura Hills, California 91301
Telephone:
(818) 991-8080
Facsimile:
(818) 991-8081
ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com
chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com
tmehr@marlinsaltzman.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
(Additional attorneys on next page)
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
JUSTIN HOLMBY and RUBEN SILVA on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
14
15
16
Plaintiffs,
v.
CARDINAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION,
17
18
19
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 15-cv-03382-RS
CLASS ACTION
JOINT NOTICE OF TENTATIVE
SETTLEMENT AND JOINT REQUEST
TO VACATE EXISTING DATES ;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order
Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS
1
Additional Attorneys for Plaintiffs:
2
TOWER LEGAL GROUP, PC
James A. Clark, Esq. (SBN 278372)
1510 J Street, Suite 125
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 361-6009
Facsimile:
(916) 361-6019
james.clark@towerlegalgroup.com
3
4
5
6
11
THE TURLEY LAW FIRM, APLC
William Turley, Esq. (SBN 122408)
bturley@turleylawfirm.com
David Mara, Esq. (SBN 230498)
dmara@turleylawfirm.com
7428 Trade Street
San Diego, California 92121
Telephone:
(619) 234-2833
Facsimile:
(619) 234-4048
12
Attorneys for Defendants:
13
THEODORA ORINGHER PC
Drew R. Hansen, Esq. (SBN 218382)
dhansen@tocounsel.com
Walter Pena, Esq. (SBN 247469)
wpena@tocounsel.com
Kenneth E. Johnson, Esq. (SBN 115814)
kjohnson@tocounsel.com
535 Anton Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Costa Mesa, California 92626-7109
Telephone:
(714) 549-6200
Facsimile:
(714) 546-6201
7
8
9
10
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order
Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS
1
TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND CLERK OF THE COURT:
2
Plaintiffs, JUSTIN HOLMBY and RUBEN SILVA (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of
3
themselves and all others similarly situated, and Defendant CARDINAL LOGISTICS
4
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (“Defendant”), by and through their respective attorneys of
5
record, hereby recite and stipulate as follows:
RECITALS
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the Parties participated in a mediation for two days on February 26, 2016 with
mediator Michael Dickstein;
WHEREAS, following protracted negotiations the parties have reached a tentative
settlement of the within action;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the mediation a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”),
memorializing and reflecting the terms of the agreement was agreed.
13
WHEREAS, defendant, its attorneys of record and counsel on behalf of plaintiffs have fully
14
executed a binding settlement as a Memorandum of Understanding on February 29, 2016 (“MOU”)
15
as described.
16
WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge and agree and commit to work in a good faith effort to
17
reach a final settlement agreement regarding any additional terms within thirty (30) days after
18
execution of the MOU.
19
20
WHEREAS, plaintiffs intend to file a motion for preliminary approval of the class action
settlement on or before April 29, 2016.
21
WHEREAS, judicial economy would be served by vacating the existing dates, including a
22
CMC currently scheduled for April 7, 2016, at 10 a.m., with the Court setting future dates as it feels
23
are necessary.
24
STIPULATION AND REQUEST
25
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully propose as follows:
26
1. That the Court vacate the Case Management Conference set for April 7, 2016, with the
27
Court setting future dates as it feels are necessary.
28
3
Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order
Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS
1
2
2. That the Parties be accorded until April 29, 2016 to file the Motion for Preliminary
Approval of Class Action Settlement.
3
SO REQUESTED AND STIPULATED:
4
DATED: March 18, 2016
MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
TOWER LEGAL GROUP, PC
5
By: /s/ Christina A. Humphrey
Christina A. Humphrey, Esq.
James A. Clark, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
DATED: March 18, 2016
THE TURLEY LAW FIRM, A PLC
10
By: /s/ Dave Mara
William Turley, Esq.
David Mara, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
DATED: March 18, 2016
15
By: /s/ Thomas P. Gies
Thomas P. Gies, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
16
17
18
CROWELL & MORING LLP
DATED: March 18, 2016
THEODORA ORINGHER PC
19
By: /s/ Drew R. Hansen
Drew R. Hansen, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
20
21
22
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
23
24
25
26
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.
DATED: March 18, 2016
By: /s/ Christina A. Humphrey
Christina A. Humphrey, Esq.
27
28
4
Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order
Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and finding good cause therein,
IT IS ORDERED that:
4
1. The Case Management Conference set for April 7, 2016 is now vacated along with any
5
deadlines associated with said date. The Court will set any future dates as is deemed
6
necessary.
7
2. The deadline for Plaintiff to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action
8
Settlement is set for April 29, 2016, based on the agreed to terms of the Memorandum of
9
Understanding executed by the parties.
10
11
12
DATED: ___________________
3/21/16
HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order
Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?