Holmby v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER 31 Joint Notice of Tentative Settlement and Joint Request to Vacate Existing Dates. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/21/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2016)

Download PDF
6 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 90058) Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. (SBN 226326) Tina Mehr, Esq. (SBN 226326) 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, California 91301 Telephone: (818) 991-8080 Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com tmehr@marlinsaltzman.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Additional attorneys on next page) 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 JUSTIN HOLMBY and RUBEN SILVA on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 Plaintiffs, v. CARDINAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 17 18 19 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 15-cv-03382-RS CLASS ACTION JOINT NOTICE OF TENTATIVE SETTLEMENT AND JOINT REQUEST TO VACATE EXISTING DATES ; [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS 1 Additional Attorneys for Plaintiffs: 2 TOWER LEGAL GROUP, PC James A. Clark, Esq. (SBN 278372) 1510 J Street, Suite 125 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 361-6009 Facsimile: (916) 361-6019 james.clark@towerlegalgroup.com 3 4 5 6 11 THE TURLEY LAW FIRM, APLC William Turley, Esq. (SBN 122408) bturley@turleylawfirm.com David Mara, Esq. (SBN 230498) dmara@turleylawfirm.com 7428 Trade Street San Diego, California 92121 Telephone: (619) 234-2833 Facsimile: (619) 234-4048 12 Attorneys for Defendants: 13 THEODORA ORINGHER PC Drew R. Hansen, Esq. (SBN 218382) dhansen@tocounsel.com Walter Pena, Esq. (SBN 247469) wpena@tocounsel.com Kenneth E. Johnson, Esq. (SBN 115814) kjohnson@tocounsel.com 535 Anton Boulevard, Ninth Floor Costa Mesa, California 92626-7109 Telephone: (714) 549-6200 Facsimile: (714) 546-6201 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND CLERK OF THE COURT: 2 Plaintiffs, JUSTIN HOLMBY and RUBEN SILVA (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of 3 themselves and all others similarly situated, and Defendant CARDINAL LOGISTICS 4 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (“Defendant”), by and through their respective attorneys of 5 record, hereby recite and stipulate as follows: RECITALS 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the Parties participated in a mediation for two days on February 26, 2016 with mediator Michael Dickstein; WHEREAS, following protracted negotiations the parties have reached a tentative settlement of the within action; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the mediation a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), memorializing and reflecting the terms of the agreement was agreed. 13 WHEREAS, defendant, its attorneys of record and counsel on behalf of plaintiffs have fully 14 executed a binding settlement as a Memorandum of Understanding on February 29, 2016 (“MOU”) 15 as described. 16 WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge and agree and commit to work in a good faith effort to 17 reach a final settlement agreement regarding any additional terms within thirty (30) days after 18 execution of the MOU. 19 20 WHEREAS, plaintiffs intend to file a motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement on or before April 29, 2016. 21 WHEREAS, judicial economy would be served by vacating the existing dates, including a 22 CMC currently scheduled for April 7, 2016, at 10 a.m., with the Court setting future dates as it feels 23 are necessary. 24 STIPULATION AND REQUEST 25 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully propose as follows: 26 1. That the Court vacate the Case Management Conference set for April 7, 2016, with the 27 Court setting future dates as it feels are necessary. 28 3 Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS 1 2 2. That the Parties be accorded until April 29, 2016 to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. 3 SO REQUESTED AND STIPULATED: 4 DATED: March 18, 2016 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP TOWER LEGAL GROUP, PC 5 By: /s/ Christina A. Humphrey Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. James A. Clark, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 DATED: March 18, 2016 THE TURLEY LAW FIRM, A PLC 10 By: /s/ Dave Mara William Turley, Esq. David Mara, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 DATED: March 18, 2016 15 By: /s/ Thomas P. Gies Thomas P. Gies, Esq. Attorney for Defendants 16 17 18 CROWELL & MORING LLP DATED: March 18, 2016 THEODORA ORINGHER PC 19 By: /s/ Drew R. Hansen Drew R. Hansen, Esq. Attorney for Defendants 20 21 22 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 23 24 25 26 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document. DATED: March 18, 2016 By: /s/ Christina A. Humphrey Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. 27 28 4 Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and finding good cause therein, IT IS ORDERED that: 4 1. The Case Management Conference set for April 7, 2016 is now vacated along with any 5 deadlines associated with said date. The Court will set any future dates as is deemed 6 necessary. 7 2. The deadline for Plaintiff to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action 8 Settlement is set for April 29, 2016, based on the agreed to terms of the Memorandum of 9 Understanding executed by the parties. 10 11 12 DATED: ___________________ 3/21/16 HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Existing Dates; [Proposed] Order Case No. 15-cv-03382-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?