Cardinale et al v. Allied Packing and Supply Inc. et al
Filing
42
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 8/17/2015. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PAMELA M. CARDINALE, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-03385-VC
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO REMAND
9
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, et
al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendants.
Re: Dkt. No. 26
12
The Cardinales' motion to remand is granted. Basco Drywall, a California corporation, is a
13
non-diverse defendant in the state court action, and therefore removal was improper and this Court
14
does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
15
The defendants' sole argument for removal is that on July 21, 2015, while appearing before
16
Judge Seligman in Alameda County Superior Court, the Cardinales abandoned any claims against
17
Basco Drywall – thus creating complete diversity – when their counsel confirmed with Judge
18
Seligman and with defense counsel that the Cardinales were proceeding to trial against only three
19
of the named defendants (which did not include Basco Drywall). But there is no indication that
20
the Cardinales intended to dismiss their claims against Basco Drywall, and it is far from clear how
21
counsel's confirmation that there were only three trial defendants affected the status of Basco
22
Drywall as a party defendant. Cf. Palmer v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, No., 2010 WL 1029480, (N.D.
23
Cal. Mar. 18, 2010). The absolute best that can be said of the defendants' argument is that it there
24
is some doubt about the status of Basco Drywall in the state court action. But "[w]here doubt
25
regarding the right to removal exists, a case should be remanded to state court." Matheson v.
26
Progressive Specialty Ins. Co., 319 F.3d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir. 2003).
27
28
The case is remanded to the Alameda County Superior Court.
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 17, 2015
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?