Cardinale et al v. Allied Packing and Supply Inc. et al

Filing 42

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 8/17/2015. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAMELA M. CARDINALE, et al., Case No. 15-cv-03385-VC Plaintiffs, 8 v. AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND 9 GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 26 12 The Cardinales' motion to remand is granted. Basco Drywall, a California corporation, is a 13 non-diverse defendant in the state court action, and therefore removal was improper and this Court 14 does not have subject matter jurisdiction. 15 The defendants' sole argument for removal is that on July 21, 2015, while appearing before 16 Judge Seligman in Alameda County Superior Court, the Cardinales abandoned any claims against 17 Basco Drywall – thus creating complete diversity – when their counsel confirmed with Judge 18 Seligman and with defense counsel that the Cardinales were proceeding to trial against only three 19 of the named defendants (which did not include Basco Drywall). But there is no indication that 20 the Cardinales intended to dismiss their claims against Basco Drywall, and it is far from clear how 21 counsel's confirmation that there were only three trial defendants affected the status of Basco 22 Drywall as a party defendant. Cf. Palmer v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, No., 2010 WL 1029480, (N.D. 23 Cal. Mar. 18, 2010). The absolute best that can be said of the defendants' argument is that it there 24 is some doubt about the status of Basco Drywall in the state court action. But "[w]here doubt 25 regarding the right to removal exists, a case should be remanded to state court." Matheson v. 26 Progressive Specialty Ins. Co., 319 F.3d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir. 2003). 27 28 The case is remanded to the Alameda County Superior Court. 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 17, 2015 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?