American Beverage Association et al v. City and County of San Francisco

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 70 Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order to Expedite the Briefing Schedule and Forgo a Hearing for Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal filed by American Beverage Association. Opposition due 5/31/16. Reply due 6/2/16. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/24/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP James K. Lynch (CA Bar No. 178600) jim.lynch@lw.com Marcy C. Priedeman (CA Bar No. 258505) marcy.priedeman@lw.com 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111-6538 Telephone: +1.415.391.0600 Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Richard P. Bress (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) rick.bress@lw.com Michael E. Bern (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) michael.bern@lw.com 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004-1304 Telephone: +1.202.637-2200 Facsimile: +1.202.637.2201 Attorneys for Plaintiff The American Beverage Association 12 Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT JUDICIAL DISTRICT 17 18 19 20 THE AMERICAN BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA STATE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION, 21 Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03415-EMC STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND FORGO A HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL 22 v. 23 24 25 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant. 26 27 28 Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction 1 Pursuant to Standing Order No. 4 and Local Rule 6-2(a), Plaintiffs The American 2 Beverage Association, California Retailers Association, and California State Outdoor 3 Advertising Association (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant the City and County of San 4 Francisco, hereby submit to the following stipulated, expedited schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion 5 for Injunction Pending Appeal: 6 Description Proposed Date 7 Deadline for Defendant’s Response May 31, 2016 Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply June 2, 2016 10 Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal Waived 11 This stipulated request to shorten time and forgo a hearing does not affect any other 8 9 12 13 14 15 deadlines in the case. The parties hereby request a Court Order shortening the deadlines described above as stipulated by the parties. In the event that the Court is disinclined to grant Plaintiffs the relief they request, 16 Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court promptly dispose of the instant motion without 17 waiting for a response from the City in order to permit Plaintiffs to file an expedited request for 18 injunction pending appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 19 20 21 Dated: May 23, 2016 Respectfully submitted, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 22 23 By /s/ James K. Lynch James K. Lynch Marcy C. Priedeman LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 T +1.415.391.0600 F +1.415.395.8095 jim.lynch@lw.com marcy.priedeman@lw.com 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction 1 Richard P. Bress Michael E. Bern LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 555 Eleventh Street, NW Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 T +1.202.637.2200 F +1.202.637.2201 rick.bress@lw.com michael.bern@lw.com 2 3 4 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff The American Beverage Association 7 8 Dated: May 23, 2016 9 By: /s/ Theodore B. Olson Theodore B. Olson 10 Theodore B. Olson (Bar No. 38137) Andrew S. Tulumello (Bar No. 196484) Helgi C. Walker (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jacob T. Spencer (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20036-5306 T +1.202.955.8668 F +1.202.530.9575 tolson@gibsondunn.com atulumello@gibsondunn.com hwalker@gibsondunn.com jspencer@gibsondunn.com 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Charles J. Stevens (Bar No. 106981) Joshua D. Dick (Bar No. 268853) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 T +1.415.393.8233 F +1.415.374.8469 cstevens@gibsondunn.com jdick@gibsondunn.com 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff California State Outdoor Advertising Association 23 24 Dated: May 23, 2016 25 By: /s/ Thomas S. Knox Thomas S. Knox Thomas S. Knox (Bar No. 73384) KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1125 Sacramento, CA 95814 T +1.916.498.9911 26 27 28 2 Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction 1 F +1.916.498.9991 tknox@klalawfirm.com 2 Attorneys for Plaintiff California Retailers Association 3 4 Dated: May 23, 2016 By: /s/ Christine Van Aken Christine Van Aken 5 6 Dennis Herrera (Bar No. 139669) City Attorney Jeremy Goldman (Bar No. 218888) Christine Van Aken (Bar No. 241755) Deputy City Attorneys City Hall, Room 234 #1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4682 T +1.415.554.4700 F +1.415.554.4745 Dennis.Herrera@sfgov.org Jeremy.Goldman@sfgov.org Christine.Van.Aken@sfgov.org 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ATTESTATION CLAUSE 14 15 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I obtained in the filing of this document the concurrence from all parties whose electronic signatures appear above. 16 17 Dated: May 23, 2016 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 18 By /s/ James K. Lynch James K. Lynch 19 S 23 ___________________________________ DERED SO OR M. Chen IS IT Hon. Edward United States District Judge 24 RT ER 27 A H 26 n M. Che LI NO 25 dward Judge E R NIA May 24, 2016 DATED:______________________ FO 22 TA DISTRIC TC RT U O 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TES UNIT ED 20 N D IS T IC T R OF C 28 3 Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?