American Beverage Association et al v. City and County of San Francisco
Filing
71
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 70 Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order to Expedite the Briefing Schedule and Forgo a Hearing for Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal filed by American Beverage Association. Opposition due 5/31/16. Reply due 6/2/16. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/24/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
James K. Lynch (CA Bar No. 178600)
jim.lynch@lw.com
Marcy C. Priedeman (CA Bar No. 258505)
marcy.priedeman@lw.com
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: +1.415.391.0600
Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Richard P. Bress (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
rick.bress@lw.com
Michael E. Bern (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
michael.bern@lw.com
555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20004-1304
Telephone: +1.202.637-2200
Facsimile: +1.202.637.2201
Attorneys for Plaintiff
The American Beverage Association
12
Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT JUDICIAL DISTRICT
17
18
19
20
THE AMERICAN BEVERAGE
ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA
RETAILERS ASSOCIATION
CALIFORNIA STATE OUTDOOR
ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION,
21
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03415-EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND FORGO A
HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL
22
v.
23
24
25
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Defendant.
26
27
28
Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC
Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing
Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction
1
Pursuant to Standing Order No. 4 and Local Rule 6-2(a), Plaintiffs The American
2
Beverage Association, California Retailers Association, and California State Outdoor
3
Advertising Association (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant the City and County of San
4
Francisco, hereby submit to the following stipulated, expedited schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion
5
for Injunction Pending Appeal:
6
Description
Proposed Date
7
Deadline for Defendant’s Response
May 31, 2016
Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply
June 2, 2016
10
Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Injunction Pending Appeal
Waived
11
This stipulated request to shorten time and forgo a hearing does not affect any other
8
9
12
13
14
15
deadlines in the case.
The parties hereby request a Court Order shortening the deadlines described above as
stipulated by the parties.
In the event that the Court is disinclined to grant Plaintiffs the relief they request,
16
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court promptly dispose of the instant motion without
17
waiting for a response from the City in order to permit Plaintiffs to file an expedited request for
18
injunction pending appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
19
20
21
Dated: May 23, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
22
23
By /s/ James K. Lynch
James K. Lynch
Marcy C. Priedeman
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
T +1.415.391.0600
F +1.415.395.8095
jim.lynch@lw.com
marcy.priedeman@lw.com
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC
Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing
Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction
1
Richard P. Bress
Michael E. Bern
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
555 Eleventh Street, NW
Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
T +1.202.637.2200
F +1.202.637.2201
rick.bress@lw.com
michael.bern@lw.com
2
3
4
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
The American Beverage Association
7
8
Dated: May 23, 2016
9
By: /s/ Theodore B. Olson
Theodore B. Olson
10
Theodore B. Olson (Bar No. 38137)
Andrew S. Tulumello (Bar No. 196484)
Helgi C. Walker (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Jacob T. Spencer (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036-5306
T +1.202.955.8668
F +1.202.530.9575
tolson@gibsondunn.com
atulumello@gibsondunn.com
hwalker@gibsondunn.com
jspencer@gibsondunn.com
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Charles J. Stevens (Bar No. 106981)
Joshua D. Dick (Bar No. 268853)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
T +1.415.393.8233
F +1.415.374.8469
cstevens@gibsondunn.com
jdick@gibsondunn.com
18
19
20
21
22
Attorneys for Plaintiff
California State Outdoor Advertising
Association
23
24
Dated: May 23, 2016
25
By: /s/ Thomas S. Knox
Thomas S. Knox
Thomas S. Knox (Bar No. 73384)
KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1125
Sacramento, CA 95814
T +1.916.498.9911
26
27
28
2
Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC
Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing
Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction
1
F +1.916.498.9991
tknox@klalawfirm.com
2
Attorneys for Plaintiff
California Retailers Association
3
4
Dated: May 23, 2016
By: /s/ Christine Van Aken
Christine Van Aken
5
6
Dennis Herrera (Bar No. 139669)
City Attorney
Jeremy Goldman (Bar No. 218888)
Christine Van Aken (Bar No. 241755)
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234
#1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4682
T +1.415.554.4700
F +1.415.554.4745
Dennis.Herrera@sfgov.org
Jeremy.Goldman@sfgov.org
Christine.Van.Aken@sfgov.org
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ATTESTATION CLAUSE
14
15
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I obtained in the filing of this
document the concurrence from all parties whose electronic signatures appear above.
16
17
Dated: May 23, 2016
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
18
By /s/ James K. Lynch
James K. Lynch
19
S
23
___________________________________
DERED
SO OR M. Chen
IS
IT Hon. Edward
United States District Judge
24
RT
ER
27
A
H
26
n
M. Che
LI
NO
25
dward
Judge E
R NIA
May 24, 2016
DATED:______________________
FO
22
TA
DISTRIC
TC
RT
U
O
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TES
UNIT
ED
20
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
28
3
Case Number: 3:15-CV-03415-EMC
Stip Request And [Prop] Order to Expedite the Briefing
Schedule for Pltfs’ Mot For Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?