American Beverage Association et al v. City and County of San Francisco

Filing 76

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING COUNT I AND COUNT II OF COMPLAINT filed by City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/3/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137
CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755
JEREMY M. GOLDMAN, State Bar #218888
Deputy City Attorneys
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
City Hall, Room 234
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

THE AMERICAN BEVERAGE
ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA RETAILERS
ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA STATE
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
ASSOCIATION,

17
18

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING COUNT I AND COUNT II OF
COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

15
16

Case No. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC

Trial Date:
vs.
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. FOR DISMISSAL (ORD. NO. 98-15);
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC

None set

1

WHEREAS, Count I and Count II of Plaintiffs’ Complaint challenges San Francisco Ordinance

2

No. 98-15 as in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution;

3

WHEREAS, subsequent to the filing of the Complaint, the City and County of San Francisco

4
5

repealed Ordinance No. 98-15; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that Plaintiffs’ challenges to Ordinance No. 98-15 are now moot,

6

the parties therefore now stipulate and agree that Count I and Count II of the Complaint shall be

7

dismissed without prejudice, with each side to bear its own fees and costs respecting Count I and

8

Count II of the Complaint, but nothing in this stipulation shall impact the parties’ rights with respect to

9

their continuing dispute concerning the validity of San Francisco Ordinance No. 100-15.

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: June 2, 2016

13
14

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
WAYNE SNODGRASS
CHRISTINE VAN AKEN
JEREMY M. GOLDMAN
Deputy City Attorneys

15
By: s/Christine Van Aken
CHRISTINE VAN AKEN

16
17

Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

18
19
20
Dated: June 2, 2016

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

21
22
23

By: *s/James K. Lynch
JAMES K. LYNCH
RICHARD P. BRESS
MICHAEL E. BERN
MARCY C. PRIEDEMAN

24
25
26

Attorneys for Plaintiff
THE AMERICAN BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION

27
28
STIP. FOR DISMISSAL (ORD. NO. 98-15);
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC

1
2

Dated: June 2, 2016

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

3
4
By: *s/Theodore B. Olson
THEODORE B. OLSON
ANDREW S. TULUMELLO
HELGI C. WALKER
JACOB T. SPENCER
CHARLES J. STEVENS
JOSHUA D. DICK

5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA STATE OUTDOOR
ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION

9
10
11
12

Dated: June 2, 2016

KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP

13
14
15

By: *s/Thomas S. Knox
THOMAS S. KNOX

16

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION

17
18

*Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has
obtained approval from this signatory.

ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
6/3/16

Dated: _____________

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

n
THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
M. Che
Edward
United States DistrictgJudge
Jud e

NO

25

RT

26

FO

24

UNIT
ED

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

21

ER

28
STIP. FOR DISMISSAL (ORD. NO. 98-15);
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC

A

H

27

R NIA

20

LI

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C