Robertson v. County of Alameda
Filing
80
SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 3/21/2016. ADR Deadlines 6/1/2016. Case Management Statement due by 6/8/2016. Case Management Conference set for 6/15/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 26, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
FRANK ROBERTSON,
Case No. 15-cv-03416-JST
Plaintiff,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
11
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
15
Event
Deadline
16
17
18
Deadline to file Amended Complaint
Deadline to:
19
20
21
22
23
March 21, 2016
meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement,
ADR process selection, and discovery plan
file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel
(form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov)
file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need
for ADR Phone Conference
http://www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov (form available at
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov)
June 1, 2016
24
Deadline to file Joint Case Management Conference
June 8, 2016
25
Further Case Management Conference
June 15, 2016
26
27
28
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders. For additional
1
information regarding the scheduled ADR deadlines, the parties may also review the prior Order
2
Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines issued in this case. ECF No. 6.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 26, 2016
5
6
7
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?