Roberts et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Filing 42

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Ashley M. Chewey. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/15/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCUS A. ROBERTS, KENNETH A. CHEWEY, ASHLEY M. CHEWEY, AND JAMES KRENN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:15-cv-3418-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Honorable Edward M. Chen v. AT&T MOBILTY LLC, Defendant. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process:  Private ADR (please identify process and provider): Private mediation with the provider to be mutually agreed to by the parties. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )  other requested deadline: Within 90 days of any Court ruling denying Defendant’s pending Motion to Compel Arbitration. Dated: December 14, 2015 By: /s/ Michael W. Sobol Michael W. Sobol Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: December 14, 2015 By: /s/ Donald M. Falk Donald M. Falk Attorney for Defendant 1283724.1 ATTESTATION I, Michael W. Sobol, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process. I hereby attest that Donald M. Falk has concurred in this filing. /s/ Michael W. Sobol Michael W. Sobol [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA ED __________________________________ ORDER IS SOEdward M. Chen Honorable IT en RT A H ER FO NO d M. Ch dwar Judge E LI 12/15/15 UNIT ED Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S x ☐ ☐ N F D IS T IC T O R C When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 1283724.1 Page 2 of 2 1283724.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?