Roberts et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Filing 82

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 81 to reset CMC filed by AT&T Mobility LLC Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/6/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MAYER BROWN LLP DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256) dfalk@mayerbrown.com ELSPETH HANSEN (SBN 292193) elspeth.hansen@mayerbrown.com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 ARCHIS A. PARASHARAMI (pro hac vice) aparasharami@mayerbrown.com KEVIN RANLETT (pro hac vice) kranlett@mayerbrown.com MAYER BROWN LLP 1999 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006-1101 Telephone: (202) 263-3000 Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 Attorneys for AT&T Mobility LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 MARCUS A. ROBERTS, KENNETH A. CHEWEY, ASHLEY M. CHEWEY, AND JAMES KRENN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 AT&T MOBILITY LLC, 21 CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DECEMBER 14, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 20 Case No. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC Defendant. Honorable Edward M. Chen 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DECEMBER 14, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC 1 2 3 Plaintiffs Marcus A. Roberts, Kenneth A. Chewey, and Ashley M. Chewey and Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC (“AT&T”) hereby stipulate and request as follows: 1. On March 13, 2017, the Court entered an order scheduling a case management 4 conference in this matter for December 14, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. and setting a December 7, 2017 5 deadline for the parties to file a joint case management statement. Dkt. No. 79. 6 2. This action is currently stayed. On April 27, 2016, the Court entered an order 7 “grant[ing] AT&T’s motion to compel arbitration” and “stay[ing] this action pending the 8 resolution of the arbitration.” Dkt. No. 60, at 18. Plaintiffs’ appeal of that order, which the 9 Ninth Circuit assigned case number 16-16915, is currently pending and was argued on October 10 11 17, 2017. 3. Because the action has been stayed and Plaintiffs’ appeal of the Court’s 12 arbitration order remains pending, the parties respectfully request that the Court: (a) continue the 13 case management conference currently scheduled for December 14, 2017; and (b) direct the 14 parties to submit a joint status report within fourteen (14) days after the Court of Appeals rules 15 on Plaintiffs’ pending appeal. 16 Dated: December 4, 2017 17 18 19 20 21 22 MAYER BROWN LLP _/s/ Donald M. Falk_____________ DONALD M. FALK Attorney for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN& BERNSTEIN, LLP _/s/ Michael Sobol______________ MICHAEL SOBOL Attorney for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 23 24 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Donald M. Falk, attest under penalty of perjury that 25 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories. 26 _/s/ Donald M. Falk_____________ DONALD M. FALK 27 28 1 CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DECEMBER 14, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The further CMC is reset to 3/1/18 at 10:30 2 9 S R NIA LI ER Chen FO ard M. dw Judge E H 8 RT 7 O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO NO 6 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN United StatesED ER District Judge A 5 UNIT ED 4 12/6/17 Dated: ___________ RT U O 3 S DISTRICT a.m. TE C A T ________________________ N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DECEMBER 14, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?