Cave Consulting Group, Inc. v. OptumInsight, Inc.,

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING re 22 Stipulation Extending Time for Optuminsight to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by OptumInsight, Inc., Signed by Chief Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/14/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Patricia A. Welch (Cal. Bar No. 127889)
Email: [e-mail]
305 Lytton Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Peter M. Lancaster (pro hac vice pending)
Email: [e-mail]
J. Thomas Vitt (pro hac vice pending)
Email: [e-mail]
Forrest Tahdooahnippah (pro hac vice pending)
Email: [e-mail]
David A. Couillard (pro hac vice pending)
Email: [e-mail]
50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500,
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Holly A. House (SB# 136045)
[e-mail]
Sophie J. Sung (SB# 279056)
[e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Richard L. Brophy (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
David W. Harlan (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
Charles W. Steese (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
Mark A. Thomas (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
Zachary C. Howenstine (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
7700 Forsyth Blvd. Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Attorneys for Defendant OPTUMINSIGHT, INC. Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

16
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22
23
24
25

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.,

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03424-JCS

Plaintiff ,
vs.
OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.,

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
FOR OPTUMINSIGHT TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT

Defendant.

26
27
28
-1JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR OPTUMINSIGHT
TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03424-JCS

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Cave Consulting Group, Inc. (“CCGroup”) and

2

Defendant OptumInsight, Inc. (“OptumInsight”), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to

3

extending the time for OptumInsight to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter.

4

WHEREAS, CCGroup filed its Complaint in this matter on July 24, 2015 (Dkt. 1);

5

WHEREAS, CCGroup served OptumInsight with its Summons and Complaint on July 27,

6
7

2015 (Dkt. 9);
WHEREAS, the current deadline for OptumInsight to answer or otherwise respond to the

8

Complaint is 21 days from the date of service, which is August 17, 2015 (see Fed. R. Civ. P.

9

12(a)(1));

10
11
12
13
14

WHEREAS, counsel for both parties have conferred and agree that OptumInsight may have
an extension of time until September 16, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;
WHEREAS, the parties do not anticipate that this extension will alter the date of any event or
any deadline already fixed by Court order;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that the time for OptumInsight to

15

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter is extended to September 16, 2015.

16

DATED: August 13, 2015

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

17
18
19
20
21
22

By:

/s/ Patricia A. Welch
Peter M. Lancaster
J. Thomas Vitt
Patricia A. Welch
Forrest Tahdooahnippah
David A. Couillard

Attorneys for Defendant OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR OPTUMINSIGHT
TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03424-JCS

1

DATED: August 13, 2015

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

2
3

By:

4

/s/ Richard L. Brophy
Richard L. Brophy
David W. Harlan
Charles W. Steese
Mark A. Thomas
Zachary C. Howenstine

5
6

PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Holly A. House
Sophie J. Sung

7
8
9
S

12
NO

Spero

A

H

C
F
D IS T IC T O
R
ATTESTATION OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES

14
15
16

ER

seph C.

LI

RT

13

Judge Jo

R NIA

ERED

O OR D
IT IS S

FO

Dated: 8/14/15

UNIT
ED

11

RT
U
O

10

ISTRIC Attorneys for Plaintiff
ES D
TC
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
AT
T

N

Pursuant to Local Rule of Practice in Civil Proceedings 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this

17

document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the

18

signatories.

19

DATED: August 13, 2015

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

20
21

By:

/s/
PATRICIA A. WELCH

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR OPTUMINSIGHT
TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03424-JCS