Cave Consulting Group, Inc. v. OptumInsight, Inc.,

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING re 37 Stipulation For Extension of Time For Plaintiff to File a Response to Dft's Motion to Dismiss & For Defendant to File a Reply filed by Cave Consulting Group, Inc. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 37 Stipulation re: 34 MOTION to Dismiss . Oppositions/Responses due by 10/9/2015. Replies due by 10/23/2015.. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/24/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

Holly A. House (SB# 136045)
[e-mail]
Sophie J. Sung (SB# 279056)
[e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Richard L. Brophy (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
David W. Harlan (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Charles W. Steese (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Mark A. Thomas (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Zachary C. Howenstine (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
7700 Forsyth Blvd. Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.,
20

Case No. 3:15-cv-03424
Plaintiff,

21
vs.
22
OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.,
23

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANT TO
FILE A REPLY

Defendant.
24

Date:
Time:
Location:
Judge:

25

November 6, 2015
9:30 a.m.
Courtroom G
Hon. Joseph C. Spero

26
27
28
STIP. FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO
MOT. TO DISMISS

15502\4881768.2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, the parties stipulate to an extension of nine days, up to and
including October 9, 2015, for Plaintiff Cave Consulting Group, Inc. to file its Opposition to
Defendant OptumInsight, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss. In addition, the parties stipulate to an
extension of seven days, up to and including October 23, 2015, for Defendant OptumInsight, Inc.
to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was filed on September 16, 2015. Plaintiff’s deadline for
responding to the Motion, without the extension, is therefore September 30, 2015. Defendant’s
deadline for filing a reply, without the extension, is seven days after the Plaintiff’s opposition is
due. Civil L.R. 7-3.
These extensions will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by
Court Order. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management
Conference are currently scheduled for November 6, 2015.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that the time for Plaintiff to
file its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is extended to October 9, 2015, and the
time for Defendant to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss is extended to October
23, 2015.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO
MOT. TO DISMISS

-2-

15502\4881768.2

1

Dated: September 22, 2015

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Richard L. Brophy
Richard L. Brophy
David W. Harlan
Charles W. Steese
Mark A. Thomas
Zachary C. Howenstine

4
5
6

PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Holly A. House
Sophie J. Sung

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

9
10
Dated: September 22, 2015

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

11
12
By: /s/ J. Thomas Vitt
Peter M. Lancaster
J. Thomas Vitt
Patricia A. Welch
Forrest Tahdooahnippah
David A. Couillard

13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.

17
18
19
20

Dated: 9/24/15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Joseph C. Spero
Chief Magistrate Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO
MOT. TO DISMISS

-3-

15502\4881768.2

1
2
3

ATTESTATION OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document attests that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories.

4
5

Dated: September 22, 2015

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Richard L. Brophy
Richard L. Brophy
David W. Harlan
Charles W. Steese
Mark A. Thomas
Zachary C. Howenstine

8
9
10

PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Holly A. House
Sophie J. Sung

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO
MOT. TO DISMISS

-4-

15502\4881768.2