Word to Info Inc v. Facebook Inc

Filing 72

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS re 17 Motion. Facebook's motion to dismiss plaintiff's willfulness claims is GRANTED. Facebook's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is DENIED AS MOOT in light of the transfer to this district. Plaintiff shall file its amended complaint within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/10/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 WORD TO INFO INC, Case No. 15-cv-03485-WHO Plaintiff, 5 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS v. 6 7 FACEBOOK INC., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendant. 8 On February 5, 2015, while this case was still pending in the Northern District of Texas, 10 defendant Facebook Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Dkt. No. 17. Facebook 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 raised two arguments in the motion: (1) lack of personal jurisdiction; and (2) insufficient 12 allegations in support of plaintiff’s willful infringement claims. Id. Although Facebook has not 13 re-noticed the motion for hearing since this case was transferred to this district more than three 14 months ago, it recently commented in its joint case management statement that the motion remains 15 pending insofar as it concerns the willfulness issue. Dkt. No. 69 at 4. 16 At the case management conference today, the parties did not dispute that Facebook’s 17 motion to dismiss plaintiff’s willfulness claims is based on the same analysis and concerns 18 materially identical allegations as Google’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s willfulness claims, which 19 I recently granted. See Word to Info, Inc v. Google Inc., No. 15-cv-03486-WHO, 2015 WL 20 6126472, at *2-3 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015). Accordingly, pursuant to the reasoning and 21 authorities cited in that Order, Facebook’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s willfulness claims is 22 GRANTED. Facebook’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is DENIED AS MOOT in light 23 of the transfer to this district. 24 Plaintiff shall file its amended complaint within 10 days of the date of this Order. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: November 10, 2015 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?