Hawkins v. S2Verify et al

Filing 117

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE RE 115 JOINT STATUS REPORT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/4/2017. Responses due by 5/5/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

REGMON L. HAWKINS, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

No. C 15-03502 WHA

v.

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE
RE JOINT STATUS REPORT

S2VERIFY, LLC,
Defendant.
/

16
17

Plaintiff’s motion for final approval calculated that 4,216 class members would receive

18

payouts from the settlement fund by subtracting 144 class members, for whom no addresses had

19

been found, from the total 4,360 (Dkt. No. 109 at 1–2 & n.1). The parties subsequently reported

20

that the number of class members for whom notices remained undeliverable had dropped from

21

144 to 66 (Dkt. No. 115 at 2). Instead of subtracting those 66 from the total 4,360, however, the

22

parties subtracted 66 from plaintiff’s prior calculation of 4,216 and concluded that only 4,150

23

class members would receive payouts (id. at 3). By MAY 5 AT 5:00 P.M., the parties shall file a

24

response explaining how they arrived at this latter conclusion.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: May 4, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE