Freedom of the Press Foundation v. United States Department of Justice
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 36 Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
6
7
FR
REEDOM OF THE PRE
O
ESS
FO
OUNDATIO
ON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
Case No. 1
15-cv-03503
3-HSG
ORDER G
GRANTING MOTION TO FILE
G
N
AMICUS C
CURIAE B
BRIEF
Re: Dkt. N 36
No.
10
11
UNITED STA
U
ATES DEPA
ARTMENT OF
O
JU
USTICE,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
.
12
13
T
ers
ee
om
ress
media
On June 10, 2016, The Reporte Committe for Freedo of the Pr and 37 m
14
org
ganizations (together, “am
(
mici”) filed a motion for leave to fil an amicus curiae brief in support
r
le
f
15
of Plaintiff’s op
P
pposition to Defendant’s motion for summary ju
s
r
udgment. Dkt. No. 36 (“
“Motion”).
16
Op
ppositions to the Motion were due Ju 24, 2016 and no opp
une
6,
position has been receive
ed.
17
“There are no strict prerequisite that must be establish prior to q
t
es
hed
qualifying fo amicus
or
18
status.” Habea Corpus Re Ctr. v. United States Dep't of Jus
as
es.
Un
stice, No. C 13-4517 CW 2013 WL
W,
19
615
57321, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2013) (citation omitted). “District cou frequen welcome
2
N
ns
urts
ntly
e
20
am
micus briefs from non-par
f
rties concern
ning legal iss
sues that hav potential ramification beyond
ve
ns
21
the parties dire
e
ectly involved.” Id. (cita
ations omitte
ed).
22
The Co finds tha the propos amicus b
ourt
at
sed
brief may pro
ovide helpfu informatio and
ul
on
23
GR
RANTS the Motion. The Court will consider the brief by am
M
e
e
mici, which w attached to the
was
d
24
Mo
otion filed on June 10, 20
n
016.
25
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
26
27
28
Da
ated: 6/27/20
016
___
__________
___________
__________
________
HA
AYWOOD S GILLIAM JR.
S.
M,
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?