Freedom of the Press Foundation v. United States Department of Justice

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 36 Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 7 FR REEDOM OF THE PRE O ESS FO OUNDATIO ON, Plaintiff, 8 9 v. Case No. 1 15-cv-03503 3-HSG ORDER G GRANTING MOTION TO FILE G N AMICUS C CURIAE B BRIEF Re: Dkt. N 36 No. 10 11 UNITED STA U ATES DEPA ARTMENT OF O JU USTICE, United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. . 12 13 T ers ee om ress media On June 10, 2016, The Reporte Committe for Freedo of the Pr and 37 m 14 org ganizations (together, “am ( mici”) filed a motion for leave to fil an amicus curiae brief in support r le f 15 of Plaintiff’s op P pposition to Defendant’s motion for summary ju s r udgment. Dkt. No. 36 (“ “Motion”). 16 Op ppositions to the Motion were due Ju 24, 2016 and no opp une 6, position has been receive ed. 17 “There are no strict prerequisite that must be establish prior to q t es hed qualifying fo amicus or 18 status.” Habea Corpus Re Ctr. v. United States Dep't of Jus as es. Un stice, No. C 13-4517 CW 2013 WL W, 19 615 57321, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2013) (citation omitted). “District cou frequen welcome 2 N ns urts ntly e 20 am micus briefs from non-par f rties concern ning legal iss sues that hav potential ramification beyond ve ns 21 the parties dire e ectly involved.” Id. (cita ations omitte ed). 22 The Co finds tha the propos amicus b ourt at sed brief may pro ovide helpfu informatio and ul on 23 GR RANTS the Motion. The Court will consider the brief by am M e e mici, which w attached to the was d 24 Mo otion filed on June 10, 20 n 016. 25 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. 26 27 28 Da ated: 6/27/20 016 ___ __________ ___________ __________ ________ HA AYWOOD S GILLIAM JR. S. M, Un nited States D District Judg ge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?