National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress et al

Filing 153

ORDER RE CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENA - If plaintiff NAF wants to file a response to defendants' October 2, 2015 #152 Letter regarding compliance with the Congressional subpoena, it must do so on or before Monday October 5, 2015 at 12:00 p.m. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/2/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, Case No. 15-cv-03522-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE CONGRESSIONAL SUBPONEA 9 10 CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Re: Dkt. No. 152 If plaintiff NAF wants to file a response to defendants’ October 2, 2015 letter regarding 13 compliance with the Congressional subpoena, it must do so on or before Monday October 5, 14 2015 at 12:00 p.m. Prior to any production in response to the Congressional subpoena on 15 October 7, 2015, absent further order of the Court, defendants shall make, preserve, and keep in 16 their or their counsel’s possession a true and correct copy of all materials to be provided to 17 Congress. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 2, 2015 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?