National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress et al

Filing 191

ORDER re #185 October 30, 2015 Order. Daleidin shall file a response to NAF's October 22, 2015 letter, not to exceed two pages, by 12:00 p.m. Tuesday November 3, 2015. The deposition authorized by the Court's October 30, 2015 Order shall not take place before the Court issues a further order, although service and scheduling may continue if underway. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/2/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, Case No. 15-cv-03522-WHO Plaintiff, 6 v. ORDER RE OCTOBER 30, 2015 ORDER 7 8 CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, et al., Defendants. 9 10 Re: Dkt. No. 185 Defendant Daleidin requests an opportunity to respond to NAF’s October 22, 2015 letter United States District Court Northern District of California 11 (Dkt. 171-3). In that letter, NAF sought leave to depose an individual NAF believes is posting 12 online materials covered by the Court’s TRO and an order requiring Daleidin to turn over all 13 materials covered by the TRO to outside counsel for CMP. Daleidin’s counsel did not understand 14 NAF’s requests to be before the Court on a motion and, therefore, was awaiting the Court’s 15 direction before filing a response. 16 In light of the ambiguity in the docket, I GRANT Daleidin’s request. Daleidin shall file a 17 response to NAF’s October 22, 2015 letter, not to exceed two pages, by 12:00 p.m. Tuesday 18 November 3, 2015. The deposition authorized by the Court’s October 30, 2015 Order shall not 19 take place before the Court issues a further order, although service and scheduling may continue if 20 underway. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For clarity going forward, when a party seeks any form of relief from the Court, that party shall file its request as either a noticed motion (under Civil Local Rule 7-2), a motion for administrative relief (under Civil Local Rule 7-11), or a joint letter seeking resolution of a discovery dispute, as appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2015 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?