Kapu Gems et al v. Diamond Imports, Inc. et al
Filing
24
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 28, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
No. C-15-3531 MMC
KAPU GEMS, et al.
13
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
14
v.
15
DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC., et al.
16
Defendants.
/
17
18
On September 18, 2015, defendants electronically filed their “Motion to Dismiss
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs’ Complaint.” Defendants have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the
Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each
document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7);
see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
¶ 2.
Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document and all attachments thereto. Defendants are hereby advised that if
they fail in the future to comply with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers
copy of each electronically filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but
1
not limited to, striking from the record any electronically filed document for which a
2
chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: September 28, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?