Kapu Gems et al v. Diamond Imports, Inc. et al

Filing 27

SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs shall have an extension to October 23, 2015, to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Defendants shall have an extension to October 30, 2015, to reply to Pla intiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss; a hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be held on November 13, 2015; and the Case Management Conference is hereby continued to January 15, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 2, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)

1 LAW OFFICES OF ABE LAMPART, P.C.
ABE LAMPART (SBN 92406, NYS Bar #1653633)
2 CHRISTINE PHAM (SBN 227033)
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415-274-0999
4 Facsimile:
415-274-2563
Email address: [e-mail]
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6 KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD.
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

v.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
COMPLAINT

DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC. and YAIR
YACHDAV,

15
Defendants.
16
17
18

Defendants Diamond Imports, Inc. and Yair Yachdav (collectively, “Defendants”) having

19 moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiffs Kapu Gems and
20 Kapu Gems Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants having noticed a hearing on their
21 Motion to Dismiss for October 23, 2015, and
22

Plaintiffs and Defendants having stipulated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A) and

23 USDC Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), through their respective counsel, that
24 because the press of business prevents counsel from being able to prepare a response to the Motion
25 to Dismiss within the time required, Plaintiffs shall have an extension up to and including October
26 23, 2015 to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and Defendants shall have an extension up
27 to and including October 30, 2015 to reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss;
28
-1-

[PROPOSED] SCHEUDLING ORDER; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03531-MMC

1

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following schedule on

2 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is established:
3

(1) Plaintiffs shall have an extension up to and including October 23, 2015 to respond to

4 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss;
5

(2) Defendants shall have an extension up to and including October 30, 2015 to reply to

6 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss; and
7

(3)

A hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be held on November 13, 2015 at

8 9:00 AM before this Court in Courtroom 7 of the above-entitled Court, located at 450 Golden Gate
9 Avenue, 19th Floor, San Francisco, California 94102.
10
11

(4) In light of the above, the Case Management Conference, presently scheduled
for November 6, 2015, is hereby CONTINUED to January 15, 2016.

12
13
14
15
16
17

Dated: October 2, 2015

___________________________
Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] SCHEUDLING ORDER; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03531-MMC