Kapu Gems et al v. Diamond Imports, Inc. et al

Filing 32

SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT. The hearing on defendants' Motion to Dismiss will be held on December 4, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 28, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2015)

1 LAW OFFICES OF ABE LAMPART, P.C.
ABE LAMPART (SBN 92406, NYS Bar #1653633)
2 CHRISTINE PHAM (SBN 227033)
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415-274-0999
4 Facsimile:
415-274-2563
Email address: [e-mail]
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6 KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD.
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

v.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
COMPLAINT

DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC. and YAIR
YACHDAV,

15
Defendants.
16
17
18

Defendants Diamond Imports, Inc. and Yair Yachdav (collectively, “Defendants”) having

19 moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiffs Kapu Gems and
20 Kapu Gems Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss having been
21 scheduled for November 13, 2015, and
22

Plaintiffs and Defendants having stipulated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A) and USDC

23 Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), through their respective counsel, that because
24 Plaintiffs’ counsel has a previously scheduled hearing on November 13, 2015 in an arbitration before
25 the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority entitled Christensen v. Nauman, et al., FINRA Case No.
26 14-03870 and therefore cannot appear before this Court on that date, the hearing on Defendants’
27 Motion to Dismiss should be rescheduled to a date mutually agreeable to the parties and the Court;
28
-1SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC

1

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following schedule on

2 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is established:
3

(1) Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is due October 23, 2015;

4

(2) Defendants’ reply in further support of their Motion to Dismiss is due October 30, 2015;

5 and
6

(3) A hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be held on December 4, 2015 at 9:00

7 AM before this Court in Courtroom 7 of the above-entitled Court, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue,
8 19th Floor, San Francisco, California 94102.
9
10
11
12

Dated: October 28, 2015

___________________________
Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC