Kapu Gems et al v. Diamond Imports, Inc. et al
Filing
64
SCHEDULING ORDER ON COUNTER-DEFENDANT KALPESH VAGHANI'S MOTION TO DISMISS DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC.'S COUNTERCLAIM FOR DAMAGES; CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS TO JULY 22, 2016. In light of the extensions granted, the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is continued to July 22, 2016, the Court being unavailable on July 15, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 14, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2016)
FOREMAN & BRASSO
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON
COUNTER-DEFENDANT KALPESH
VAGHANI’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC.’S
COUNTERCLAIM FOR DAMAGES;
CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION
TO DISMISS TO JULY 22, 2016
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON COUNTERDEFENDANT KALPESH
VAGHANI’S MOTION TO DISMISS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2016 to reply to Defendant Diamond Imports, Inc.’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss;
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following schedule on
Counter-Defendant Kalpesh Vaghani’s Motion to Dismiss is established:
(1) Defendant Diamond Imports, Inc.’s shall have an extension up to and including June
21, 2016 to respond to Counter-Defendant Kalpesh Vaghani’s Motion to Dismiss; and
(2) Counter-Defendant Kalpesh Vaghani’s shall have an extension up to and including
June 28, 2016 to reply to Defendant Diamond Imports, Inc.’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss.
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the extensions granted, the hearing
on the Motion to Dismiss is hereby CONTINUED to July 22, 2016, the Court being
unavailable on July 15, 2016.
11
DATED: June 14, 2016
9
12
___________________________
Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON COUNTERDEFENDANT KALPESH
VAGHANI’S MOTION TO DISMISS
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?