Curry & Company, Inc et al v. Hapag-Lloyd (America) Inc et al

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING re 12 Stipulation to Extend Time in Which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Hapag-Lloyd, AG Hamburg, Hapag-Lloyd (America) Inc. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/24/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

JOHN D. GIFFIN, CASB No. 89608
[e-mail]
JENNIFER M. PORTER, CASB No. 261508
[e-mail]
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
A Professional Corporation
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants
HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA), LLC and
HAPAG-LLOYD A.G.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

CURRY & COMPANY, INC., a corporation; and ) Case No. CV 15-3535 JCS
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE
)
COMPANY, a corporation,
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME IN
) WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
Plaintiffs,
) COMPLAINT
vs.
HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA) INC. d.b.a.
HAPAG-LLOYD, a corporation; HAPAGLLOYD, AG HAMBURG, a corporation,

18

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

19
20

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs CURRY & COMPANY, INC. and GREAT AMERICAN

21

INSURANCE COMPANY (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action against

22

Defendants HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA), LLC and HAPAG-LLOYD, AG (erroneously sued as

23

Hapag-Lloyd (America) Inc. d.b.a. Hapag-Lloyd and Hapag-Lloyd, AG Hamburg) (collectively

24

referred to as “Defendants”);

25
26
27
28

WHEREAS, Defendants were served with the Complaint on August 3, 2015 and therefore
must respond to the Complaint by August 24, 2015;
WHEREAS, Defendants have requested and Plaintiffs have granted Defendants additional
time to explore the matter and respond to the Complaint;
-1KYL_SF688247
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT Case No. CV 15-3535 JCS

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs CURRY & COMPANY, INC. and

2

GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and Defendants HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA),

3

LLC and HAPAG-LLOYD, AG, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal

4

Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Northern District Local Rule 6-1, Defendants may have to and

5

including September 8, 2015 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. This extension of time is

6

Defendants’ first extension and does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

7

Court order.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

9
10

DATED: August 21, 2015

/s/ Jennifer M. Porter
JOHN D. GIFFIN
JENNIFER M. PORTER
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
Attorneys for Defendants
HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA), LLC and
HAPAG-LLOYD A.G.

DATED: August 21, 2015

/s/ Joshua E. Kirsch
JOSHUA E. KIRSCH
GIBSON ROBB & LINDH LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CURRY & COMPANY, INC. and GREAT
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

I, Jennifer Porter, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each
of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
that the foregoing is true and correct.

R NIA

pero

LI

ER

FO

S
seph C.

Judge Jo

H

26

RT

25

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

NO

24

UNIT
ED

23

Dated: 8/24/15

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

22

S

21

A

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28
-2KYL_SF688247
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT Case No. CV 15-3535 JCS