Daniel v. Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER GRANTING re 10 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/7/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP Lauri A. Mazzuchetti (pro hac vice) Edward J. Mullins III (pro hac vice) One Jefferson Road, 2nd Floor Parsippany, NJ 07054 Telephone: (973) 503-5900 Facsimile: (973) 503-5950 lmazzuchetti@kelleydrye.com emullins@kelleydrye.com KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP Lee S. Brenner (State Bar No. 180235) Catherine D. Lee (State Bar No. 258550) 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 23rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-4008 Telephone: (310) 712-6100 Facsimile: (310) 712-6199 lbrenner@kelleydrye.com clee@kelleydrye.com Attorneys for Defendant FIVESTARS LOYALTY, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 SUNIL DANIEL, individually, and on behalf of Case No. 3:15-cv-03546 all others similarly situated, JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, (L.R. 6-1) v. Action Filed: Trial Date: June 23, 2015 None FIVE STARS LOYALTY, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TO TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 517497 LA01\LEECA\700433.3 1 2 RECITALS WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, Plaintiff Sunil Daniel (“Plaintiff”) filed the initial Class- 3 Action Complaint (“Complaint”) against Defendant FiveStars Loyalty, Inc. (“Defendant”) 4 (collectively, the “Parties”) in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco 5 (the “Action”); 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Defendant the Complaint on July 14, 2015; 7 WHEREAS, on July 31, 2015, Defendant removed the Action to the United States District 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Court for the Northern District; WHEREAS, the deadline for responding to Plaintiff’s Complaint is August 7, 2015 pursuant to Rule 81(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel asked Plaintiff’s counsel for an extension of time as set forth below; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint to August 21, 2015. 15 16 STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant 17 through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), that Defendant’s new 18 time to respond to the Complaint is August 21, 2015. 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 20 21 DATED: August 6, 2015 22 23 JAURIGUE LAW GROUP Michael J. Jaurigue Abigail A. Zelenski David Zelenski GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP Lionel Z. Glancy Marc L. Godino Mark S. Greenstone 24 25 26 By:_/s/ Mark S. Greenstone_____________ Mark S. Greenstone Attorneys for Plaintiff Sunil Daniel 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TO TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT LA01\LEECA\700433.3 1 DATED: August 6, 2015 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP Lauri A. Mazzuchetti Lee S. Brenner Edward J. Mullins III Catherine D. Lee 2 3 4 By: __/s/ Lee S. Brenner_______________________ Lee S. Brenner Attorneys for FiveStars Loyalty, Inc. 5 6 7 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose 8 behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing of this stipulation and have authorized the filing 9 of this stipulation. 10 11 DATED: August 6, 2015 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP Lauri A. Mazzuchetti Lee S. Brenner Edward J. Mullins III Catherine D. Lee 12 13 14 By: ___/s/ Lee S. Brenner____________________ Lee S. Brenner Attorneys for FiveStars Loyalty, Inc. 15 16 S ERED O ORD IT IS S 19 NO ER 22 Spero A H 21 seph C. LI RT 20 Judge Jo R NIA Dated: 8/7/15 FO UNIT ED 18 RT U O 17 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TO TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT LA01\LEECA\700433.3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?