Daniel v. Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.

Filing 38

ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference continued to 12/15/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 12/8/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/13/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP Lauri A. Mazzuchetti (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Mullins (admitted pro hac vice) One Jefferson Road, 2nd Floor Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Telephone: (973) 503-5900 Facsimile: (973) 503-5950 lmazzuchetti@kelleydrye.com emullins@kelleydrye.com 10 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP Lee S. Brenner (State Bar No. 180235) Catherine D. Lee (State Bar No. 258550) 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 23rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-4008 Telephone: (310) 712-6100 Facsimile: (310) 712-6199 lbrenner@kelleydrye.com clee@kelleydrye.com 11 Attorneys for Defendant FIVESTARS LOYALTY, INC. 7 8 9 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 SUNIL DANIEL, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 21 23 FIVE STARS LOYALTY, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. motio 24 25 26 27 28 LA01\LEECA\702903.1 (Assigned to Hon. William H. Orrick) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. 22 Case No. 3:15-cv-03546-WHO ORDER [Joint Stipulation filed concurrently herewith] Action Filed: Trial Date: June 23, 2015 None Set 1 2 3 4 The Court, upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation To Continue Scheduling Conference, hereby finds good cause to ORDER the following: The Court continues the Scheduling Conference from November 10, 2015 to December 15, 2015 at 2 p.m. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 October 13, 2015 DATED:___________________ 8 9 Hon. William H. Orrick District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA01\LEECA\702903.1 1 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?