Daniel v. Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.
Filing
38
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference continued to 12/15/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 12/8/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/13/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
Lauri A. Mazzuchetti (admitted pro hac vice)
Edward Mullins (admitted pro hac vice)
One Jefferson Road, 2nd Floor
Parsippany, New Jersey 07054
Telephone: (973) 503-5900
Facsimile: (973) 503-5950
lmazzuchetti@kelleydrye.com
emullins@kelleydrye.com
10
KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
Lee S. Brenner (State Bar No. 180235)
Catherine D. Lee (State Bar No. 258550)
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 23rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4008
Telephone:
(310) 712-6100
Facsimile:
(310) 712-6199
lbrenner@kelleydrye.com
clee@kelleydrye.com
11
Attorneys for Defendant FIVESTARS LOYALTY, INC.
7
8
9
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
SUNIL DANIEL, individually, and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
23
FIVE STARS LOYALTY, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
motio
24
25
26
27
28
LA01\LEECA\702903.1
(Assigned to Hon. William H. Orrick)
ORDER CONTINUING
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
v.
22
Case No. 3:15-cv-03546-WHO
ORDER
[Joint Stipulation filed concurrently
herewith]
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
June 23, 2015
None Set
1
2
3
4
The Court, upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation To Continue Scheduling
Conference, hereby finds good cause to ORDER the following:
The Court continues the Scheduling Conference from November 10, 2015 to December 15,
2015 at 2 p.m.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
October 13, 2015
DATED:___________________
8
9
Hon. William H. Orrick
District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA01\LEECA\702903.1
1
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?