Natali, Inc. v. Howard et al

Filing 28

ORDER granting 27 Ex Parte Application re 26 MOTION for Default Judgment by the Court as to Shannon Dawn Howard, Shane Howard and Sean Boyle For Order Continuing Hearing Date filed by Natali, Inc. Reset Hearing as to 26 MOTION for Default Judgment by the Court as to Shannon Dawn Howard, Shane Howard and Sean Boyle. Motion Hearing reset for 4/8/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/9/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2016)

1
2
3
4

Ray K. Shahani, Esq., State Bar No. 160,814
Attorney at Law
[e-mail]
Oyster Point Marina Plaza
400 Oyster Point Blvd., Suite 518
South San Francisco, California 94080
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff
NATALI, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
NATALI, INC, a California corporation,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15

SHANNON DAWN HOWARD, an
Individual, SHANE HOWARD, an
Individual, SEAN BOYLE, an Individual,
MATTHEW DONHAM, an Individual, and
DOES 1-10,

16
Defendants.
17

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Case No:

3:15-cv-3589 CRB

Honorable CHARLES R. BREYER
ORDER

Hearing Date: March 25, 2016
Time:
10:00 a.m.
[Proposed] New Hearing Date: April 8, 2016

18
19

WHEREAS Plaintiff Natali, Inc. (“Natali” or “Plaintiff”) filed its Ex Parte Application

20

for Order Continuing Hearing on Motion For Entry of Default Judgment (“Ex Parte

21

Application”) against Defendants Shannon Dawn Howard, Shane Howard and Sean Boyle

22

(“Defendants”);

23

The Court, having read and considered the pleadings, declarations and exhibits on file in

24

this matter and having reviewed such evidence as was presented in support of Plaintiff’s Ex

25

Parte Application, including the Declaration of Ray K. Shahani, and finding good cause, hereby

26

grants

27
28

///
Natali, Inc v. Howard, Howard, Boyle and Donham et al.
[Proposed] Order

-1-

1

Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application and continues the hearing in Plaintiff’s pending Motion for

2

Default Judgment as against all Defendants to April 8, 2016.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED:

5
6

DATED: March 9, 2016

_______________________________
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Judge, United States District Court for the
Northern District of California

7
8
9
10

PRESENTED BY:
Ray K. Shahani,
Attorney at Law

11
12

By: /s/ Ray K. Shahani
Ray K. Shahani
Attorney for Plaintiff Natali, Inc.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Natali, Inc v. Howard, Howard, Boyle and Donham et al.
[Proposed] Order

-2-