Harvey v. Google Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS RESPONSE THERETO filed by Google Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/21/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Susan D. Fahringer (CA Bar No. 162978)
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Sunita B Bali (CA Bar No. 274108)
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Google Inc. and Google Payment Corporation

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
14
SUSAN HARVEY,

Case No. 15-CV-03590-EMC

15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
GOOGLE INC.,

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO AMEND
COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS’
RESPONSE THERETO

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, it is stipulated between Plaintiff Susan Harvey and
Defendant Google Inc. by their respective attorneys:
1.

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed in her Complaint in the Eastern

District of California, see Dkt. No. 1;
2.

WHEREAS, on June 25, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Transfer or Dismiss,

seeking to transfer this matter to the Northern District of California or, alternatively, dismiss the
action, see Dkt. No. 10;

27
28

-1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 13-CV-03900-EMC
LEGAL127422118.1

1

3.

WHEREAS, on August 4, 2015, pursuant to a stipulation by the parties, the

2

Eastern District of California entered an order transferring this action to this Court, see Dkt.

3

No. 20;

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

4.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Defendant has

agreed to allow Plaintiff to amend her Complaint;
5.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the parties have agreed to extend the

time within which Defendant must answer or respond to Plaintiff’s amended complaint;
6.

WHEREAS, the parties do not believe that this extension will alter any currently

existing deadlines or the current case schedule;
7.

By entering into this Stipulation, Defendant does not waive any defenses, rights, or

privileges.

12

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following:

13

1.

Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before September 30, 2015.

14

2.

Because this case has been transferred to this Court and because Plaintiff will file

15
16
17

an amended complaint, Defendant withdraws its Motion to Transfer or Dismiss, Dkt. No. 20;
3.

Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint, whether by answer, motion, or

otherwise, shall be extended to October 30, 2015.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 13-CV-03900-EMC
LEGAL127422118.1

1
DATED: September 17, 2015

PERKINS COIE LLP

2
3

5

By: s/ Susan D. Fahringer
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978
[e-mail]
Sunita B. Bali, Bar No. 274108
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

4

7
8

DATED: September 17, 2015

LAW OFFICES OF TODD M.
FRIEDMAN, P.C.

9
By: /s/ Suren N. Weerasuriya
Suren N. Weerasuriya, Cal. Bar No.
278521

10
11

Attorneys for Susan Harvey

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 13-CV-03900-EMC
LEGAL127422118.1

1

Local Rule 5-1(i) Attestation

2

I, Susan D. Fahringer, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule5-1(i), that the

3

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

4
5

DATED: September 17, 2015

PERKINS COIE LLP

6

8

By: s/ Susan D. Fahringer
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978
[e-mail]

9

Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

7

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-4STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 13-CV-03900-EMC
LEGAL127422118.1

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff

3

shall file an amended complaint on or before September 30, 2015. Defendant’s deadline to

4

respond to the Complaint, whether by answer, motion, or otherwise, shall be extended to

5

October 30, 2015.

6
IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

13

dwa
Judge E

ER

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-5STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 13-CV-03900-EMC
LEGAL127422118.1

A

H

14

hen

rd M. C

NO

12

R NIA

11

__________________________________
Hon. Edward M. Chen ED
RDER
United S SO O
I States District Judge
IT

FO

10

UNIT
ED

9/21/15

DATED: ____________________

RT
U
O

9

S

8

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C