Sanchez v. Central Mortgage Company et al

Filing 34

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/10/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GLORIA SANCHEZ, Case No. 15-cv-03597-JSC Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 9 10 CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff Gloria Sanchez (“Plaintiff”) brings this foreclosure-related action against 13 Defendant Central Mortgage Company (“Defendant”) alleging that Defendant engaged in fraud, 14 violated the California Homeowners Bill of Rights, and is liable for breach of contract and breach 15 of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with its roles as servicer of Plaintiff’s 16 residential mortgage loan. (Dkt. No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to 17 Dismiss, filed on October 8, 2015, in which Defendant seeks to dismiss the complaint in its 18 entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) subdivisions (1) and (6). (Dkt. No. 17.) 19 When Plaintiff failed to file a timely opposition to the motion to dismiss, the Court issued an order 20 directing Plaintiff to show cause why the motion should not be granted and to file an opposition to 21 the motion. (Dkt. No. 29.) Plaintiff filed a timely show cause response and, instead of filing an 22 opposition, has lodged an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 31, 32.) Defendant may file a response 23 to Plaintiff’s show cause response by November 16, 2015. The hearing on Defendant’s motion to 24 dismiss, previously set for November 12, 2015, is RESCHEDULED for November 19, 2015. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2015 ________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?