Choudhuri v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
22
ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. CASE REFERRED TO ADR UNIT FOR TELEPHONE CONFERNCE TO BE COMPLETED BY 9/17/2015. Reset Deadlines as to 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Responses due by 9/3/2015. Replies due by 9/17/2015. Motion Hearing set for 10/1/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 8/18/2015. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KABITA CHOUDHURI,
Case No. 15-cv-03608-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER FOLLOWING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
9
10
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Counsel for Wells Fargo has agreed to accept service by email of all papers filed in this
14
case up to today. Choudhuri is ordered to email to Wells Fargo's counsel, by today, all papers that
15
have been filed in the case.
16
A hearing on Choudhuri's motion for a preliminary injunction is scheduled for October 1,
17
2015 at 10 a.m. Wells Fargo's opposition to the motion is due September 3, 2017. Any reply by
18
Choudhuri must be filed on or before September 17, 2015. The parties agree that the temporary
19
restraining order issued by Judge Donato remains in place until a ruling on the motion for a
20
preliminary injunction.
21
22
23
If Wells Fargo wishes to file a motion to dismiss, it must do so in time for a hearing to take
place on the motion on October 1, 2015.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers this
24
foreclosure-related action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a telephone
25
conference to assess this case's suitability for mediation or a settlement conference.
26
27
28
Plaintiff and Defendants' counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be
scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as possible but no later than September 17, 2015.
Plaintiff and Defendants' counsel shall be prepared to discuss the following subjects:
1
1. Identification and description of claims and alleged defects in loan documents.
2
2. Prospects for loan modification.
3
3. Prospects for settlement.
4
5
6
7
8
The parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone
conference.
In preparation for the telephone conference, Plaintiff shall do the following:
1. Review relevant loan documents and investigate the claims to determine
whether they have merit.
2. If Plaintiff is seeking a loan modification to resolve all or some of the claims,
10
Plaintiff shall prepare a current, accurate financial statement and gather all of
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
the information and documents customarily needed to support a loan
12
modification request. Further, Plaintiff shall immediately notify Defendants'
13
counsel of the request for a loan modification.
14
3. Provide counsel for Defendants with information necessary to evaluate the
15
prospects for loan modification, in the form of a financial statement, worksheet
16
or application customarily used by financial institutions.
17
18
In preparation for the telephone conference, counsel for Defendants shall do the following.
1. If Defendants are unable or unwilling to do a loan modification after receiving
19
notice of Plaintiff's request, counsel for Defendants shall promptly notify
20
Plaintiff to that effect.
21
22
2. Arrange for a representative of each Defendant with full settlement authority to
participate in the telephone conference.
23
The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be held.
24
After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation for
25
further ADR proceedings.
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 18, 2015
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KABITA CHOUDHURI,
Case No. 15-cv-03608-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on August 19, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
18
19
20
Kabita Choudhuri
331 Richardson Way
Mill Valley, CA 94941
21
22
Dated: August 19, 2015
23
24
25
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
26
27
28
By:________________________
Kristen Melen, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable VINCE CHHABRIA
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?