Mestayer v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al

Filing 78

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 76 of Dismissal with Prejudice, Between Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Only filed by Gloria A. Mestayer. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/20/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 11 12 13 14 15 16 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY Clark Ovruchesky, Esq. (301844) co@colawcalifornia.com 750 B. Street, Suite 3300 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 356-8960 Attorney for Plaintiff, Gloria A. Mestayer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GLORIA A. MESTAYER, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. Defendants. 17 Case No.: 15-cv-03645-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. ONLY HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 18 19 20 Plaintiff GLORIA A. MESTAYER (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and Defendant 21 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (hereinafter “Defendant 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Experian”) (jointly hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”), hereby stipulate to dismiss Defendant Experian only from the above-entitled action, with prejudice. The Parties agree that this Court can proceed to dismiss Defendant Experian, with prejudice, from this action and this Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement of this action. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PAGE 1 OF 2 1 Dated: June 16, 2016 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 2 3 By: 4 5 6 Dated: June 16, 2016 /s/ Clark Ovruchesky Clark Ovruchesky ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF Respectfully submitted, 7 JONES DAY 8 By: 9 10 12 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION 13 16 17 18 Dated: June 16, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY By: 19 20 22 23 24 26 Experian is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendant Experian shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 6/20/2016 Date: _______________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant S 21 /s/ Clark Ovruchesky Clark Ovruchesky ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ____________________________________ HON. JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN D RDERE UNITED STATES IDISTRICT JUDGE S SO O IT 27 28 NO PAGE 2 OF 2 A H ER LI RT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL en d M. Ch dwar Judge E R NIA 15 Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, I hereby certify that the content of this document is acceptable to all defense counsels listed above, and that I have obtained their authorizations to affix their electronic signatures to this document. FO 14 UNIT ED LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 11 /s/ Michael A. Deshong Michael A. Deshong ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT EXPERIAN N F C CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Mestayer v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al. Case No: No: 15-cv-03645-EMC 1 2 3 I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years, 4 employed in the County of San Diego, State of California, and not a party to the 5 above-entitled cause. 6 On June 16, 2016, I served a true copy of: 7 8 9 10 • STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. ONLY LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY 750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [X] By ECF: On this date, I electronically filed the following document(s) with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent electronic notification of such filing to all other parties appearing on the docket sheet. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct (and that I am employed in or by the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made). Executed on June 16, 2016 San Diego, CA. 19 By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky CLARK OVRUCHESKY, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?