Betorina et al v. Randstad US, L.P.

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 21 and Notice of Settlement to Vacate Case Management Conference filed by Fred Bell. Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 10/27/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/26/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK Norman B. Blumenthal (State Bar #068687) 2 Kyle R. Nordrehaug (State Bar #205975) Molly A. DeSario (State Bar #230763) 3 Aparajit Bhowmik (State Bar #248066) Piya Mukherjee (State Bar #274217) 4 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, CA 92037 5 Telephone: (858)551-1223 Facsimile: (858) 551-1232 6 Website: www.bamlawca.com 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 MARCUS BETORINA, JOSEPH CASE No. 3:15-cv-03646-EMC DIAZ, and FRED BELL, individuals on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, 17 Plaintiffs, 18 19 vs. 20 RANDSTAD US, L.P., a Limited Partnership; and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, 21 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (reset) 22 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT Case No.: 3:15-cv-03646-EMC 1 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION TO VACATE CMC 2 3 The parties have reached a class action settlement and are in the process of 4 preparing to file a motion for preliminary approval. The parties, therefore, respectfully 5 request that the Court VACATE the case management conference scheduled for 6 September 15, 2016 so as to allow the parties to file the motion for preliminary approval. 7 8 9 Dated: August 15, 2016 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK 10 By: _____/s/__________________________ Aparajit Bhowmik Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 Dated: August 15, 2016 SEYFARTH SHAW 14 ____/s/ ________________________ Aparajit Bhowmik Attorneys for Defendant By: 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED . Further CMC reset from 9/15/16 to 10/27/16 at 10:30 a.m. An update joint CMC statement 22 dwar Judge E ER H 25 RT 24 26 en d M. Ch NO 23 D RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF AS MO LI 21 A 20 UNIT ED S RT U O S DISTRICT TE _____________________________________ C TA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE R NIA shall be filed by 10/20/16. 19 Dated : ___________, 2016 8/26 FO 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT -1- Case No.: 3:15-cv-03646-EMC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [F.R.C.P. ยง5] 1 2 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. I 3 4 am employed by Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhomik which is located in the County 5 of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the 6 within action. My business address is 2255 Calle Clara, La Jolla, California 92037. 7 On August 15, 2016, I served the document(s) described as below in the manner set 8 forth below: 9 (1) 10 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION AND 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT 12 CONFERENCE 13 14 _XX_ 15 16 17 18 _XX_ (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE): I caused the listed documents to be electronically filed through the CM/ECF system at the United States District Court for the Central District of California which generates a Notice of Electronic Filing to all parties and constitutes service of the electronically filed documents on all parties for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Federal): I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made, and that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of perjury. 19 20 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the 21 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 15, 2016 at La Jolla, California. 22 _______/s/________________ Aparajit Bhowmik 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT -2- Case No.: 3:15-cv-03646-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?