Betorina et al v. Randstad US, L.P.
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 21 and Notice of Settlement to Vacate Case Management Conference filed by Fred Bell. Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 10/27/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/26/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016)
1 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK
Norman B. Blumenthal (State Bar #068687)
2
Kyle R. Nordrehaug (State Bar #205975)
Molly A. DeSario (State Bar #230763)
3
Aparajit Bhowmik (State Bar #248066)
Piya Mukherjee (State Bar #274217)
4 2255 Calle Clara
La Jolla, CA 92037
5 Telephone: (858)551-1223
Facsimile: (858) 551-1232
6 Website: www.bamlawca.com
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
MARCUS BETORINA, JOSEPH
CASE No. 3:15-cv-03646-EMC
DIAZ, and FRED BELL, individuals
on behalf of themselves and on behalf
of all persons similarly situated,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
19
vs.
20
RANDSTAD US, L.P., a Limited
Partnership; and Does 1 through 50,
Inclusive,
21
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO VACATE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
(reset)
22
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
Case No.: 3:15-cv-03646-EMC
1
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION TO VACATE CMC
2
3
The parties have reached a class action settlement and are in the process of
4 preparing to file a motion for preliminary approval. The parties, therefore, respectfully
5 request that the Court VACATE the case management conference scheduled for
6 September 15, 2016 so as to allow the parties to file the motion for preliminary approval.
7
8
9 Dated: August 15, 2016
BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK
10
By:
_____/s/__________________________
Aparajit Bhowmik
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
13 Dated: August 15, 2016
SEYFARTH SHAW
14
____/s/ ________________________
Aparajit Bhowmik
Attorneys for Defendant
By:
15
16
17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED . Further CMC reset
from 9/15/16 to 10/27/16 at 10:30 a.m. An update joint CMC statement
22
dwar
Judge E
ER
H
25
RT
24
26
en
d M. Ch
NO
23
D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
AS MO
LI
21
A
20
UNIT
ED
S
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
_____________________________________
C
TA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
R NIA
shall be filed by 10/20/16.
19 Dated : ___________, 2016
8/26
FO
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
-1-
Case No.: 3:15-cv-03646-EMC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [F.R.C.P. ยง5]
1
2
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. I
3
4 am employed by Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhomik which is located in the County
5 of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the
6 within action. My business address is 2255 Calle Clara, La Jolla, California 92037.
7 On August 15, 2016, I served the document(s) described as below in the manner set
8 forth below:
9
(1)
10
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION AND
11
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT
12
CONFERENCE
13
14 _XX_
15
16
17
18
_XX_
(BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE): I caused the listed documents to be
electronically filed through the CM/ECF system at the United States
District Court for the Central District of California which generates a
Notice of Electronic Filing to all parties and constitutes service of the
electronically filed documents on all parties for purposes of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
(Federal): I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the
bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made, and that the
foregoing is true and correct under penalty of perjury.
19
20
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the
21 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 15, 2016 at La Jolla, California.
22
_______/s/________________
Aparajit Bhowmik
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
-2-
Case No.: 3:15-cv-03646-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?