Bornnard v. Greyhound Lines Inc

Filing 24

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER for Jury Trial by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. A Further Case Management Conference is set for 4/12/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. A Pretrial Conference is set for 8/16/20 16 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The Jury Trial shall begin on 9/12/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WALTER E. BORNNARD, Case No. 3:15-cv-03660 EDL Plaintiff, 8 v. CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL 9 10 GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Following the Case Management Conference held on November 10, 2015 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 14 A further case management conference is set for April 12, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. before 15 Magistrate Judge Laporte in Courtroom E, 15th floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate 16 Avenue, San Francisco, California. An updated joint case management conference statement shall 17 be filed no later than April 5, 2016. 18 19 20 21 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the following case management and pretrial order is entered: 1. TRIAL DATE a. Jury trial will begin on September 12, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom E, 22 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Should a daily transcript and/or 23 realtime reporting be desired, the parties shall make arrangements with Debra Campbell, Court 24 Reporter Supervisor, at (415) 522-2079 or Debra_Campbell@cand.uscourts.gov, at least 14 days 25 prior to the trial date. 26 b. The length of the trial will be not more than 6 days. 27 2. DISCOVERY 28 a. All non-expert discovery shall be completed no later than April 19, 2016. 1 There will be no further non-expert discovery after that date except by order of the Court for good 2 cause shown. Motions to compel non-expert discovery must be filed within the time limits 3 contained in Civil Local Rule 26-2. 4 b. Initial expert disclosures shall be made no later than May 13, 2016 . 5 Rebuttal expert disclosures shall be made no later than June 17, 2016. All treating physicians who 6 will provide opinion testimony beyond that which can be provided by a lay person must be 7 disclosed as expert witnesses, but they need not prepare expert reports unless ordered to do so by 8 the Court. 9 c. All expert discovery shall be completed no later than July 1, 2016. There 10 will be no further expert discovery after that date except by order of the Court for good cause 11 United States District Court Northern District of California shown. Motions to compel expert discovery must be filed within the time limits contained in Civil 12 Local Rule 26-2. 13 d. Rule 26(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires all parties to 14 supplement or correct their initial disclosures, expert disclosures, pretrial disclosures, and 15 responses to discovery requests under the circumstances itemized in that Rule, and when ordered 16 by the Court. The Court expects that the parties will supplement and/or correct their disclosures 17 promptly when required under that Rule, without the need for a request from opposing counsel. 18 In addition to the general requirements of Rule 26(e)(1), the parties will supplement and/or 19 correct all previously made disclosures and discovery responses 28 days before the fact 20 discovery cutoff date. 21 e. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 37-1(b), telephone conferences are available to 22 resolve disputes during a discovery event, such as a deposition, where the resolution during the 23 event likely would result in substantial savings of expense or time. 24 f. Privilege logs. If a party withholds information that is responsive to a 25 discovery request, and is otherwise discoverable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by 26 claiming that it is privileged, or protected from discovery under the attorney work product doctrine 27 28 2 1 or any other protective doctrine (including, but not limited to, privacy rights), that party shall 2 prepare a "privilege log" (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)) setting forth the privilege relied upon and 3 specifying separately for each document or for each category of similarly situated documents: 4 1. The name and job title or capacity of the author; 5 2. The name and job title or capacity of each recipient; 6 3. The date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) 7 on which it was sent to or shared with persons other than its 8 author(s); 9 4. The title and description of the document; 10 5. The subject matter addressed in the document; 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 6. The purpose(s) for which it was prepared or communicated; and 12 7. The specific basis for the claim that it is privileged. 13 The privilege log will be produced as quickly as possible, but no later than 14 days after 14 the discovery responses are due (in a rolling production, 14 days after each set of documents is 15 produced), unless the parties stipulate or the Court orders otherwise in a particular case. 16 g. In responding to requests for documents and materials under Rule 34 of the 17 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties shall affirmatively state in a written response served 18 on all other parties the full extent to which they will produce materials and shall, promptly after 19 the production, confirm in writing that they have produced all such materials so described that are 20 locatable after a diligent search of all locations at which such materials might plausibly exist. 21 3. MOTIONS 22 The last day to file a motion, or stipulation and proposed order, to join other parties shall 23 be December 11, 2015 . 24 The last day to file a motion, or stipulation and proposed order, to amend the pleadings 25 shall be December 11, 2015 . 26 The last day for hearing dispositive motions shall be June 17, 2016. Dispositive motions 27 28 3 1 shall be served and filed no later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the scheduled hearing date. 2 Briefing shall be in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. 3 4. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION/SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 4 The parties have agreed to engage in mediation through the Court's Alternative Dispute 5 Resolution department. 6 5. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 7 a. A pretrial conference shall be held on August 16, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in 8 Courtroom E, 15th Floor. Each party shall attend personally or by lead counsel who will try 9 the case. The timing of disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) and 10 other pretrial disclosures shall be governed by this order. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California b. At least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the pretrial conference, lead 12 counsel shall meet and confer regarding: 13 (1) Preparation and content of the joint pretrial conference statement; 14 (2) Preparation and exchange of pretrial materials to be served and lodged 15 pursuant to paragraph 5(c) below; and 16 (3) Settlement of the action. 17 c. At least twenty (20) days prior to the pretrial conference, counsel and/or 18 parties shall: 19 (1) Serve and file a joint pretrial statement that includes the pretrial 20 disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) as 21 well as the following supplemental information: 22 (a) The Action. 23 (i) Substance of the Action. A brief description of the 24 substance of claims and defenses which remain to be 25 decided. 26 (ii) Relief Prayed. A detailed statement of all the relief 27 28 4 1 claimed, particularly itemizing all elements of damages 2 claimed as well as witnesses, documents or other evidentiary 3 material to be presented concerning the amount of those 4 damages. 5 (b) The Factual Basis of the Action. 6 (i) Undisputed Facts. A plain and concise statement of 7 all relevant facts not reasonably disputable, as well as which 8 facts parties will stipulate for incorporation into the trial 9 record without the necessity of supporting testimony or 10 exhibits. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California (ii) Disputed Factual Issues. A plain and concise 12 statement of all disputed factual issues which remain to be 13 decided. 14 (iii) Agreed Statement. A statement assessing whether all 15 or part of the action may be presented upon an agreed 16 statement of facts. 17 (iv) Stipulations. A statement of stipulations requested or 18 proposed for pretrial or trial purposes. 19 (c) Disputed Legal Issues. 20 Without extended legal argument, a concise statement of 21 each disputed point of law concerning liability or relief, 22 citing supporting statutes and decisions, and any procedural 23 or evidentiary issues. 24 (d) Trial Preparation. 25 (i) Witnesses to Be Called. With regard to witnesses 26 disclosed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27 28 5 1 26(a)(3)(A), a brief statement describing the substance of the 2 testimony to be given. 3 (ii) Estimate of Trial Time. An estimate of the number 4 of hours needed for the presentation of each party's 5 case, indicating possible reductions in time through 6 proposed stipulations, agreed statements of facts, or 7 expedited means of presenting testimony and 8 exhibits. 9 (iii) Use of Discovery Responses. Designate excerpts 10 from discovery that the parties intend to present at 11 United States District Court Northern District of California trial, other than solely for impeachment or rebuttal, 12 from depositions specifying the witness with page 13 and line references, from interrogatory answers, or 14 from responses to requests for admission. 15 (e) Trial Alternatives and Options. 16 (i) Settlement Discussion. A statement summarizing the 17 status of settlement negotiations and indicating 18 whether further negotiations are likely to be 19 productive. 20 (ii) Amendments, Dismissals. A statement of requested 21 or proposed amendments to pleadings or dismissals 22 of parties, claims or defenses. 23 (iii) Bifurcation, Separate Trial of Issues. A statement of 24 whether bifurcation or a separate trial of specific 25 issues is feasible and desired. 26 (f) Miscellaneous. 27 28 6 1 Any other subjects relevant to the trial of the action or 2 material to its just, speedy and inexpensive determination. 3 (2) Serve and file trial briefs, motions in limine (including any motion 4 regarding the qualifications or testimony of any expert witness), 5 proposed voir dire questions, jury instructions, verdict forms and 6 excerpts from discovery that will be offered at trial (include a copy 7 of the deposition testimony or admission). The parties shall submit 8 proposed jury instructions jointly. If there are any instructions on 9 which the parties cannot agree, those instructions may be submitted 10 separately; 11 United States District Court Northern District of California (3) Serve and file an exhibit setting forth the qualifications and 12 experience of each expert witness; 13 (4) Serve and file a list of each party's exhibits by numbers 1-500 14 (plaintiff) or numbers 750-1250 (defendant), including a brief statement describing the substance 15 and purpose of each exhibit and the name of the sponsoring witness; 16 (5) Exchange exhibits which shall be premarked (plaintiff shall use 17 numbers 1-500; defendant shall use numbers 750-1250) and tabbed. Exhibits shall be three-hole 18 punched and shall be submitted in binders. Each exhibit shall be marked on the front page or on 19 the back of the last page with the information contained in Exhibit A to this Order; and 20 (6) Deliver two sets of all premarked exhibits to chambers (exhibits are 21 not to be filed). The two sets of premarked exhibits shall be for Court use only. The parties shall 22 bring a third set of their trial exhibits to trial to witnesses. 23 No party shall be permitted to call any witness or offer any exhibit in its case in chief that 24 is not disclosed in its pretrial statement, exchanged with opposing counsel, and delivered to the 25 Court, by the above deadline, without leave of the Court and for good cause. 26 d. At least (10) days prior to the pretrial conference, after meeting and 27 28 7 1 conferring in a good faith attempt to resolve any objections, counsel and/or parties shall serve and 2 file: (1) any objections to exhibits or to the use of deposition excerpts or other discovery; (2) any 3 objections to non-expert witnesses; (3) any objection to proposed voir dire questions, jury 4 instructions and verdict forms that the parties have been unable in good faith to resolve; (4) any 5 opposition to a motion in limine. No replies shall be filed. 6 e. All motions in limine and objections shall be heard at the pretrial 7 conference. 8 6. JURY TRIAL 9 a. Counsel shall submit an agreed upon set of voir dire questions to be posed 10 by the Court. Any voir dire questions on which counsel cannot agree may be submitted 11 United States District Court Northern District of California separately. Counsel shall be allowed brief follow-up voir dire after the Court's questioning. 12 b. The following jury instructions from the Manual of Model Civil Jury 13 Instructions for the Ninth Circuit (2007 Edition) shall be given absent objection: 1.1-1.2, 1.6-1.14, 14 1.18, 2.11. Counsel shall submit jointly an agreed upon set of case specific instructions, using the 15 Ninth Circuit Manual where appropriate. Do not submit duplicates of those listed above. Any 16 instructions on which counsel cannot agree may be submitted separately. Each requested 17 instruction shall be typed in full on a separate page with citations to the authority upon which it is 18 based and a reference to the party submitting it. A second blind copy of each instruction and 19 verdict form shall also be submitted, omitting the citation to authority and the reference to the 20 submitting party. 21 7. All documents filed with the Clerk of the Court shall list the civil case number followed 22 by the initials "EDL." One copy shall be clearly marked as a chambers copy. Chambers copies 23 shall be three-hole punched at the left side, suitable for insertion into standard binders. In 24 addition, all proposed jury instructions, motions in limine, forms of verdict and trial briefs shall be 25 accompanied by a diskette containing a copy of the document formatted in WordPerfect 6.1, 7, 8, 26 9, or 10 (Windows) or 8.0 (Windows). 27 28 8 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: November 10, 2015 3 4 ______________________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 1 EXHIBIT A 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number: Case Number: Case Number: 5 PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ 6 Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ 7 By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number: Case Number: Case Number: PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ 12 By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk 13 ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 Case Number: Case Number: Case Number: PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 Case Number: Case Number: Case Number: 22 PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ PLTF / DEFT EXHIBIT NO._____________ 23 Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ Date Admitted:________________________ 24 By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk By:_______________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ 4 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 16 17 18 19 20 25 26 27 28 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?