Chenault v. City of San Ramon, et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim: Granting 29 .(sklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016) Modified on 3/4/2016 (mklS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III (State Bar No. 55632) NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) ELIZABETH M. DOOLEY (State Bar No. 289510) MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 1211 Newell Avenue Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 939-5330 Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SAN RAMON 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1211 NEWELL AVENUE, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ODIS WILLIAM CHENAULT, JR., 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION CITY OF SAN RAMON, SAN RAMON POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND JOHN DOES NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 4 (IN OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES), 17 Case No. C15-03662 SK Defendants. 15 18 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 21 WHEREAS the parties are respectfully requesting that the Court continues the deadline 22 for mediation for several months, until after the parties have had sufficient time to conduct 23 discovery and go forward with mediation. 24 25 WHEREAS currently this matter has a deadline to mediate this case by essentially April 12, 2016. (See ECF 27). 26 WHEREAS the parties and mediator have agreed on a tentative mediation date of May 17, 27 2016, which was set to give the parties some time for discovery and per the availability of counsel 28 and the mediator. STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION C15-03662 SK 1 2 3 4 5 6 As such, the parties jointly request the Court set the new mediation deadline to May 31, 2016. Our assigned mediator, Mr. Randy Hall, agrees with the timing as set forth herein. WHEREAS good cause exists to continue the mediation deadline. The parties attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. IT IS SO STIPULATED 8 Dated: March 4, 2016 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1211 NEWELL AVENUE, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 WHEREAS the parties need some time for discovery before mediation can go forward. 10 MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP By: 11 12 13 Dated: March 4, 2016 14 LAW OFFICES OF MARK KELSEY By: 15 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Noah G. Blechman James V. Fitzgerald, III / Noah G. Blechman Elizabeth M. Dooley Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SAN RAMON _/s/ Mark Kelsey____ Mark Kelsey, Attorney for Plaintiff ODIS CHENAULT ORDER PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: The mediation deadline is continued to May 31, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED 21 22 Dated: March 4, 2016 23 By: Honorable Sallie Kim United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION C15-03662 SK 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?