Chenault v. City of San Ramon, et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim: Granting 29 .(sklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016) Modified on 3/4/2016 (mklS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III (State Bar No. 55632)
NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167)
ELIZABETH M. DOOLEY (State Bar No. 289510)
MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,
BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
1211 Newell Avenue
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 939-5330
Facsimile: (925) 939-0203
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SAN RAMON
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1211 NEWELL AVENUE, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330
McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ODIS WILLIAM CHENAULT, JR.,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR
MEDIATION
CITY OF SAN RAMON, SAN RAMON
POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND JOHN
DOES NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 4 (IN
OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL
CAPACITIES),
17
Case No. C15-03662 SK
Defendants.
15
18
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action,
through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
21
WHEREAS the parties are respectfully requesting that the Court continues the deadline
22
for mediation for several months, until after the parties have had sufficient time to conduct
23
discovery and go forward with mediation.
24
25
WHEREAS currently this matter has a deadline to mediate this case by essentially April
12, 2016. (See ECF 27).
26
WHEREAS the parties and mediator have agreed on a tentative mediation date of May 17,
27
2016, which was set to give the parties some time for discovery and per the availability of counsel
28
and the mediator.
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION
C15-03662 SK
1
2
3
4
5
6
As such, the parties jointly request the Court set the new mediation deadline to May 31, 2016.
Our assigned mediator, Mr. Randy Hall, agrees with the timing as set forth herein.
WHEREAS good cause exists to continue the mediation deadline.
The parties attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
8
Dated: March 4, 2016
9
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1211 NEWELL AVENUE, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330
McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
7
WHEREAS the parties need some time for discovery before mediation can go forward.
10
MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,
BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
By:
11
12
13
Dated: March 4, 2016
14
LAW OFFICES OF MARK KELSEY
By:
15
16
17
18
19
20
/s/ Noah G. Blechman
James V. Fitzgerald, III / Noah G. Blechman
Elizabeth M. Dooley
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SAN RAMON
_/s/ Mark Kelsey____
Mark Kelsey, Attorney for Plaintiff
ODIS CHENAULT
ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
The mediation deadline is continued to May 31, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED
21
22
Dated: March 4, 2016
23
By:
Honorable Sallie Kim
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION
C15-03662 SK
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?